The Hummingbird Phase 3 program included two Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of brexanolone in women with moderate and severe PPD. Entry criteria for participants included depressed mood and/or loss of interest and associated symptoms of depression, including appetite problems, sleep problems, motor problems, lack of concentration, loss of energy, poor self-esteem and suicidality that began no earlier than the third trimester and no later than the first four weeks following delivery."This is the first Phase 3 program conducted specifically in women with PPD and these results exemplify the value of Sage's distinct approach to clinical research," said Jeff Jonas, M.D., chief executive officer of Sage. "We are pleased with the findings, specifically the rapid onset of action and duration of effect observed in all arms of the Hummingbird program. We believe the data represent an unprecedented opportunity in the development of treatments for PPD, and may serve as the catalyst for a paradigm shift in how the disease is approached and, if approved, may change how PPD is treated." "Today illustrates what an exciting time it is in CNS research and drug development," said Steve Kanes, M.D., Ph.D., chief medical officer of Sage. "Sage is deliberately pursuing a translational clinical strategy that can expedite medical innovation and potentially transform the lives of patients. This strategy begins with open label trials in a carefully selected disease indication, such as PPD, where patients are in need of transformative treatment options. Our approach seeks to establish signals for safety and activity and if a signal is observed, we move efficiently into later stage development. Our brexanolone research for a treatment in PPD followed this path, resulting in the successful data we are announcing today." Summary of Top-line Brexanolone Phase 3 Results Effect on Postpartum Depressive Symptoms:
- In both trials at all doses, brexanolone achieved the primary endpoint, a significant mean reduction from baseline in the HAM-D total score at 60 hours compared to placebo.
- Study 202B - Patients with severe PPD (n=122):
- Patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups (brexanolone 90 µg/kg/hour, brexanolone 60 µg/kg/hour, or placebo) on a 1:1:1 basis.
- Brexanolone 90 µg/kg/hour treatment was associated with a statistically significant mean reduction in HAM-D total score of 17.7 points from baseline compared with a 14.0 point mean reduction in HAM-D total score associated with placebo (p=0.0242).
- Brexanolone 60 µg/kg/hour treatment was associated with a statistically significant mean reduction in HAM-D total score of 19.9 points from baseline compared with a 14.0 point mean reduction in HAM-D total score associated with placebo (p=0.0011).
- Statistically significant differences in the reduction in HAM-D total score of brexanolone versus placebo were first observed at 48 hours and the effect at 60 hours was maintained through the 30-day follow-up with statistical significance for both brexanolone dose groups.
- Improvement in the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) at 60 hours was consistent with the primary endpoint (p=0.0096 for 90 µg/kg/h dose and p=0.0124 for 60 µg/kg/h dose).
- Study 202C - Patients with moderate PPD (n=104):
- Patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups (brexanolone 90 µg/kg/hour or placebo) on a 1:1 basis.
- Brexanolone treatment was associated with a statistically significant mean reduction in HAM-D total score of 14.2 points from baseline at 60 hours (p=0.0160) compared with a 12.0 point mean reduction in HAM-D total score associated with placebo.
- Statistical significance was first observed at 48 hours and remained through Day 7, but not at Day 30. However, the effect observed at 60 hours in the brexanolone group was maintained through the 30-day follow-up.
- Improvement in the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) at 60 hours was consistent with the primary endpoint (p=0.0005).
- Study 202B - Patients with severe PPD (n=122):
- Brexanolone was generally well tolerated in both studies with similar rates of adverse events across all treatment groups.
- In each trial, there was one patient who experienced a serious adverse event; neither required hospitalization and one of which was deemed by the investigator not to be study-drug related.
- The most common adverse events in the studies were headache, dizziness, and somnolence.
About the Hummingbird Program: 202B and 202CThe Hummingbird program included two Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials (Study 202B and Study 202C), designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of brexanolone in women with moderate and severe postpartum depression (PPD), aged between 18 and 45 years (inclusive) who were =6 months postpartum at screening in the United States.
- Patients enrolled in both trials (202B; 202C) were required to have had a Major Depressive Episode that began no earlier than the third trimester and no later than the first four weeks following delivery, and to also be less than six months postpartum at the time of enrollment.
- Trial participants in 202B were required to have a HAM-D score of 26 or above prior to treatment. These patients were randomized to one of three treatment groups (brexanolone 90 µg/kg/hour, brexanolone 60 µg/kg/hour, or placebo) on a 1:1:1 basis.
- Trial participants in 202C were required to have a HAM-D score of between 20 and 25 prior to treatment. These patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups (brexanolone 90 µg/kg/hour or placebo) on a 1:1 basis.
About the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)HAM-D is a validated rating scale used to provide an assessment of depression, and as a guide to evaluate recovery. This scale is an accepted regulatory endpoint for depression. The scale is used to rate the severity of their depression by probing mood, feelings of guilt, suicide ideation, insomnia, agitation, anxiety, weight loss, and somatic symptoms. About Brexanolone (SAGE-547) Brexanolone (SAGE-547) is an allosteric modulator of both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA A receptors. Allosteric modulation of neurotransmitter receptor activity results in varying degrees of desired activity rather than complete activation or inhibition of the receptor. Sage's proprietary i.v. formulation of brexanolone is being developed for the treatment of postpartum depression (PPD) and has been granted Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA and PRIority MEdicines (PRIME) designation from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in PPD. About Sage Therapeutics Sage Therapeutics is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to developing novel medicines to transform the lives of patients with life-altering central nervous system (CNS) disorders. Sage has a portfolio of novel product candidates targeting critical CNS receptor systems, GABA and NMDA. Sage's lead program, a proprietary i.v. formulation of brexanolone (SAGE-547), is in Phase 3 clinical development for postpartum depression. Sage is developing its next generation modulators, including SAGE-217 and SAGE-718, in various CNS disorders. For more information, please visit www.sagerx.com. Forward-Looking Statements Various statements in this release concern Sage's future expectations, plans and prospects, including without limitation: our expectations regarding the potential for brexanolone in the treatment of PPD; our view as to the unmet need for additional treatment options in PPD and how brexanolone might address the needs of PPD patients and families, if successfully developed and approved; our estimate as to the number of patients with PPD; our plans and expectations with respect to future regulatory submissions and activities related to brexanolone and ongoing development; our views as to the potential for approval of brexanolone and future commercialization and the impact on our company; and our expectations regarding development, planned activities and the potential for success of our other product candidates. These forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees of future performance, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated in these forward-looking statements, including the risks that: the clinical and non-clinical data we have generated to date may be determined by regulatory authorities, despite prior advice, to be insufficient to file for or gain regulatory approval to launch and commercialize our proprietary formulation of brexanolone and regulatory authorities may determine that additional trials or data are necessary in order to file for or obtain approval; regulatory authorities may find fault with the data generated at particular clinical site or sites or with the activities of our trial monitor or may disagree with our analyses of the results of our trials or identify issues with our manufacturing or quality systems, and any such findings or issues could require additional data or analyses or changes to our systems that could delay or prevent us from gaining approval of brexanolone; we may encounter unexpected safety or tolerability issues with brexanolone or any of our product candidates in ongoing or future development; the number of patients with PPD or the unmet need for additional treatment options may be significantly smaller than we expect; we may not be able to successfully demonstrate the efficacy and safety of any of our other product candidates at each stage of development; success in early stage clinical trials may not be repeated or observed in ongoing or future studies; the efficacy data generated in ongoing or future clinical trials may be negative or less robust than we expect; ongoing or future clinical trials may not support further development of our other product candidates or be sufficient to gain regulatory approval to market any product; decisions or actions of regulatory agencies may affect the initiation, timing, progress, number, size and cost of clinical trials, and our ability to proceed with further clinical trials of a product candidate in a particular indication, or at all, or our ability to obtain marketing approval; we may decide that a development pathway for a product candidate in one or more indications is no longer feasible or advisable or that the unmet need no longer exists; and we may encounter technical and other unexpected hurdles in the development and manufacture of our product candidates; as well as those risks more fully discussed in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as discussions of potential risks, uncertainties, and other important factors in our subsequent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, any forward-looking statements represent our views only as of today, and should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date. We explicitly disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.