The most recent short interest data has been released for the 04/13/2017 settlement date, and we here at Dividend Channel like to sift through this fresh data and order the underlying components of the S&P 500 by "days to cover." There are a number of ways to look at short data, for example the total number of shares short; but one metric that we find particularly useful is the "days to cover" metric because it considers both the total shares short and the average daily volume of shares typically traded. The number of shares short is then compared to the average daily volume, in order to calculate the total number of trading days it would take to close out all of the open short positions if every share traded represented a short position being closed.In our new rank based on the most recent short interest data, Ventas Inc ( VTR - Get Report) has taken over the position of #138 most shorted S&P 500 component, from Pinnacle West Capital Corp ( PNW which is now in the #218 spot. The "days to cover" at 04/13/2017 was 5.27 for VTR, and 4.05 for PNW; this compares to the average across all S&P 500 components of 4.47 (up from the average back on the 03/31/2017 settlement date of 4.07). The chart below shows the movement over time of the "days to cover" values of both VTR and PNW, versus the average S&P 500 component. Below is a chart showing the relative positions of VTR versus PNW over time within the 500 S&P 500 components, with #1 representing the component with the highest "days to cover" value (most heavily shorted) and #500 representing the component with the lowest "days to cover" value (least heavily shorted): A stock with a high "days to cover" value compared to its peers would be considered to have a higher level of short interest as compared to those peers. This could mean short sellers are using the stock to hedge a long bet elsewhere, or could also mean that short sellers believe the price of the stock will decline. When short sellers eventually cover their positions, by definition there must be buying activity because a share that is currently sold short must be purchased to be covered. So investors tend to keep an eye on that "days to cover" metric, because a high value could predict a sharper price increase should the company put out some unexpectedly good news — short sellers might rush to cover positions, and if the "days to cover" number is high, it is more difficult to close those positions without sending the stock higher until the higher price produces enough sellers to generate the necessary volume. Below is a three month price history chart comparing the stock performance of VTR vs. PNW: According to the ETF Finder at ETF Channel, VTR and PNW collectively make up 1.51% of the iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA ETF (LRGF) which is higher by about 0.1% on the day Wednesday.
TheStreet’s Fundamentals of Investing Course will teach you the keys to making the right decisions in any market.
TheStreet’s Personal Finance Essentials Course will teach you money management basics and investing strategies to help you avoid major financial pitfalls.
TheStreet Courses offers dedicated classes designed to improve your investing skills, stock market knowledge and money management capabilities.
More from Stocks
Global Stocks Drift Lower Ahead of U.S. GDP Data; Dollar Tests Two-Year High
Global stocks drifted lower Thursday as investors focused on a key reading of U.S. economic growth later in the session and the spillover from a mixed set of earnings last night on Wall Street.
Amazon Plans to Offer Free One-Day Shipping With Prime Memberships
Amazon plans to ramp up the new one-day shipping standard throughout 2019.
Jim Cramer: My Bet's on the 'Ladies' in This Year's Draft
Analyzing this year's stock draft contest and individual stock-picking vs. indexing.
Ford Stock Jumps As Automaker Rolls Past Analyst Estimates
Ford shares shifted into overdrive in after-hours trading on Thursday as the No. 2 U.S. automaker cruised to a handy earnings beat.
NY Attorney General To Probe Facebook's Collection of Email Addresses: Report
Facebook uploaded the email contacts of 1.5 million new users without asking permission, but says it was "unintentional."