It's earnings season and that means that everybody is transfixed on what this quarter's numbers might mean for the market.
But ignore the earnings announcements for a moment. There's a little known SEC form that companies are sending in this quarter that could make you bigger gains than the next round of earnings data.
I'm talking about the 13-F. Institutional investors with more than $100 million in assets are required to file a 13-F, a form that breaks down their stock positions for public consumption. From hedge funds to mutual funds to insurance companies, any professional investor who manages more than that $100 million watermark are required to file a 13F.
Big earnings season moves are predicated on surprises - by definition, they're impossible to predict with any regularity. But a sneak peek at what the "smart money" is doing? That's pretty valuable.
13-F filings can provide a mountain of data to investors - and not always what you think.
Typically, investors fixate on the stocks that professional investors are buying. But buys are only half the story.
Instead, there's a much bigger message coming from the stocks they're selling. And in 2017, as the stock market plows into new all-time highs this winter, hedge funds are sending a message by dumping shares in a handful of big stocks. The question here is whether you should join them.
When institutional investors unload stocks, they're sending a big message. After all, admitting to their "sell list" is often an act of contrition for hedge funds - and even the most disciplined investors don't like spotlighting the names they're getting hammered on.
Taking a close look at fund managers' hate list is valuable for two important reasons: it includes names you should sell too, and it includes names that could actually present buying opportunities.
Why would you buy a name that pro investors hate?
It's because, often, when investors get emotionally involved with the names in their portfolios, they do the wrong thing. The big performance gap between hedge funds and the S&P 500 index in the last couple of years is proof of that. So that leaves us free to take a more sober look at the names fund managers are capitulating on.
So, without further ado, here's a look at three stocks fund managers hate the most.
Bank of Nova Scotia
The financial sector was high on fund managers' hate list this past quarter - and while there was no shortage of banks that pro investors dumped during the start of 2017, one particular bank had a special place for sellers: Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS) . This Canadian banking stock, better known as Scotiabank, saw a net sell operation of 16.45 million shares by early-filing funds, representing a $1.22-billion-dollar value at current price levels.
Scotiabank is the third-largest bank in Canada, with nearly $900 billion CAD in assets. The firm's reach extends well beyond our neighbor to the North - Scotiabank operates in more than 55 countries, with significant operations in Latin America and Asia. Still, most of the firm's focus remains at home in Canada, a market that's a bit of a mixed bag for investors. On the one hand, Canadian regulators have created an attractive environment for incumbent banks, with high returns and limited competition. On the other hand, Canadian household debt is at record levels thanks to low interest rates and ebullient real estate prices in the country's hottest markets, creating a potential problem down the line as tightening threatens to put pressure on pricing.
Ultimately, Scotiabank's fortunes rest on growth in its Latin American operations as well as a rebound in strength for the commodity prices that are closely tied to the strength of the Canadian dollar. In other words, it's largely a timing play -- and the timing doesn't look great in 2017. BNS has been correcting hard since peaking back in February.
Funds look like they're on the right side of this trade. If you own it, consider taking recent gains off the table here...