The most recent short interest data has been released for the 01/31/2017 settlement date, and we here at Dividend Channel like to sift through this fresh data and order the underlying components of the Nasdaq 100 by "days to cover." There are a number of ways to look at short data, for example the total number of shares short; but one metric that we find particularly useful is the "days to cover" metric because it considers both the total shares short and the average daily volume of shares typically traded. The number of shares short is then compared to the average daily volume, in order to calculate the total number of trading days it would take to close out all of the open short positions if every share traded represented a short position being closed.In our new rank based on the most recent short interest data, Ctrip.com International Ltd ( CTRP - Get Report) has taken over the position of #5 most shorted Nasdaq 100 component, from Lam Research Corp ( LRCX) which is now in the #24 spot. The "days to cover" at 01/31/2017 was 8.90 for CTRP, and 4.78 for LRCX; this compares to the average across all Nasdaq 100 components of 3.66 (down from the average back on the 01/13/2017 settlement date of 4.03). The chart below shows the movement over time of the "days to cover" values of both CTRP and LRCX, versus the average Nasdaq 100 component. Below is a chart showing the relative positions of CTRP versus LRCX over time within the 100 Nasdaq 100 components, with #1 representing the component with the highest "days to cover" value (most heavily shorted) and #100 representing the component with the lowest "days to cover" value (least heavily shorted): A stock with a high "days to cover" value compared to its peers would be considered to have a higher level of short interest as compared to those peers. This could mean short sellers are using the stock to hedge a long bet elsewhere, or could also mean that short sellers believe the price of the stock will decline. When short sellers eventually cover their positions, by definition there must be buying activity because a share that is currently sold short must be purchased to be covered. So investors tend to keep an eye on that "days to cover" metric, because a high value could predict a sharper price increase should the company put out some unexpectedly good news — short sellers might rush to cover positions, and if the "days to cover" number is high, it is more difficult to close those positions without sending the stock higher until the higher price produces enough sellers to generate the necessary volume. Below is a three month price history chart comparing the stock performance of CTRP vs. LRCX: According to the ETF Finder at ETF Channel, CTRP and LRCX collectively make up 2.15% of the First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Fund ETF (QQEW) which is relatively unchanged on the day Friday.
More from Stocks
Google's Deal for Looker Data Draws Fed Antitrust Review
Google faces scrutiny from federal antitrust regulators for its proposed deal for Looker Data Sciences.
China's Silence Makes It Clear There's No Trade Deal at All
Stock markets have rallied on the "Phase 1" agreement reached with China, but the optimism is misplaced, with no mention of any trade deal whatsoever from the Chinese side.
Analysts' Advice Just Doesn't Stick for This Company
Unless you like to buy high and sell low, taking some analysts' word on 3M has made no sense.
Boeing Shares in Focus After CEO Dennis Muilenburg Stripped of Chairman's Role
Boeing shares drifted lower Monday after the planemaker said it would strip CEO Dennis Muilenburg of his chairman role in order to allow his to focus entire on bringing the grounded 737 MAX aircraft back into service.