The New #43 Most Shorted S&P 500 Component: Cintas

The most recent short interest data has been released for the 11/15/2016 settlement date, and we here at Dividend Channel like to sift through this fresh data and order the underlying components of the S&P 500 by "days to cover." There are a number of ways to look at short data, for example the total number of shares short; but one metric that we find particularly useful is the "days to cover" metric because it considers both the total shares short and the average daily volume of shares typically traded. The number of shares short is then compared to the average daily volume, in order to calculate the total number of trading days it would take to close out all of the open short positions if every share traded represented a short position being closed.

START SLIDESHOW:
Top 25 S.A.F.E. Dividend Stocks »

In our new rank based on the most recent short interest data, Cintas Corporation ( CTAS) has taken over the position of #43 most shorted S&P 500 component, from Host Hotels & Resorts Inc ( HST) which is now in the #80 spot. The "days to cover" at 11/15/2016 was 6.36 for CTAS, and 5.24 for HST; this compares to the average across all S&P 500 components of 3.27 (down from the average back on the 10/31/2016 settlement date of 4.30). The chart below shows the movement over time of the "days to cover" values of both CTAS and HST, versus the average S&P 500 component.

Loading+chart++2016+TickerTech.com

Below is a chart showing the relative positions of CTAS versus HST over time within the 500 S&P 500 components, with #1 representing the component with the highest "days to cover" value (most heavily shorted) and #500 representing the component with the lowest "days to cover" value (least heavily shorted):

If you liked this article you might like

Market Recon: The 'Reflation' Trade Had Been Priced to Perfection

Buy 'Trump Stocks' on Any Market-Induced Weakness: Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap (Friday 1/20/17)

5 Things You Must Know Before the Market Opens Thursday

Cintas May Be the 'Ultimate Trump Stock' -- but Is It a Buy?