Finally, the PTAB's decision indicates that certain arguments made by Voip-Pal will require additional support, which would typically be submitted in the form of expert declarations during the proceedings. In particular, the PTAB indicates that evidence is required to support Voip-Pal's contention that the primary reference discloses a scheme that is incompatible with the methods disclosed by the secondary references, (Voip-Pal has retained experts to provide evidence in support of its contentions)."Voip-Pal will vigorously advance its position and will file additional evidence before the PTAB, where we ultimately expect to be successful in showing that Apple's petitions lack merit," said Emil Malak, CEO. Mr. Malak continued, "We acknowledge the concerns of the many irate Voip-Pal shareholders who see different treatment between the detailed factual analysis that accompanied the decision not to institute the Unified Patents Inter Partes Review (IPR) on Friday and the lack of analysis, by the same panel, for the decision to institute the Apple IPR's dealing with the same patent on Monday. While we recognize the apparent disparity, we want to assure shareholders that the Inter Partes Review is a judicial, not a political process, and we are confident that the technical merit of the patents will prevail in the hearings." About Voip-Pal.com Inc.Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. ("Voip-Pal") is a publicly traded corporation (OTCQB:VPLM) headquartered in Bellevue, Washington. The Company owns a portfolio of patents relating to Voice-over-Internet Protocol ("VoIP") technology that it is currently looking to monetize.
Corporate Website:www.voip-pal.comIR inquiries:IR@voip-pal.comIR Contact: Rich Inza(954) 495-4600