A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than January 6, 2017. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. If you wish to join the litigation, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-988.html or to discuss your rights or interests regarding this class action, please contact Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. of Rosen Law Firm toll free at 866-767-3653 or via e-mail at email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/the-rosen-law-firm or on Twitter: https://twitter.com/rosen_firm. Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation.
Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of Exxon Mobil Corporation common stock (NYSE:XOM) from February 19, 2016 through October 27, 2016, both dates inclusive (the "Class Period") of the January 6, 2017 lead plaintiff deadline in the class action. The lawsuit seeks to recover damages for Exxon investors under the federal securities laws. To join the Exxon class action, go to http://www.rosenlegal.com/cases-988.html or call Phillip Kim, Esq. or Kevin Chan, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org for information on the class action. NO CLASS HAS YET BEEN CERTIFIED IN THE ABOVE ACTION. UNTIL A CLASS IS CERTIFIED, YOU ARE NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL UNLESS YOU RETAIN ONE. YOU MAY ALSO REMAIN AN ABSENT CLASS MEMBER AND DO NOTHING AT THIS POINT. YOU MAY RETAIN COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE. The complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Exxon repeatedly highlighted the strength of its business model and its transparency and reporting integrity, particularly with regard to its oil and gas reserves and the value of those reserves. Exxon's public statements were materially false and misleading when made as they failed to disclose that: (1) Exxon's own internally generated reports concerning climate change recognized the environmental risks caused by global warming and climate change; (2) given the risks associated with global warming and climate change, Exxon would not be able to extract the existing hydrocarbon reserves Exxon claimed to have and, therefore, a material portion of Exxon's reserves were stranded and should have been written down; and (3) Exxon had employed an inaccurate "price of carbon" - the cost of regulations such as a carbon tax or a cap-and-trade system to push down emissions - in evaluating the value of certain of its future oil and gas prospects in order to keep the value of its reserves materially overstated. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages.