To paraphrase the late musician Robert Palmer, "You might as well face it, you're addicted to the Fed."
It seems that the vast majority of investors are suffering from some form of Fed obsession, as global stock markets seemingly rise and fall on mere rumors of moves the U.S. central bank might or might not make. Analysts attempt to discern nuances in the language used by Janet Yellen and other policymakers for clues about future Federal Reserve actions. Is all of this overdone?
The evidence is very clear that the stock market performs dramatically better when interest rates are trending downward rather than upward. In our recently published book, Invest With The Fed, Gerald R. Jensen of Creighton University, Luis Garcia-Feijoo of Florida Atlantic University and I found clear evidence of an association between Federal Reserve monetary policy and capital market returns. Importantly, it is the direction of the movement of rates and not the absolute level of rates that appears to matter.
From 1966 through 2013, the S&P 500 rose at an annualized rate of 15.2% when interest rates were falling. In contrast, when rates were trending upward, the S&P 500 advanced at a more pedestrian 5.9% clip. But, the operative word here is "advanced." Currently, many investors are operating as if the sky is falling, and they're exiting equities after the Fed initiated its first rate hike in nearly a decade.
Instead of exiting stocks, however, investors would prudent to rotate part of their equity portfolio into stocks that have historically performed well during a rising-interest rate environment. Since 1966, energy, consumer goods, utilities and food stocks have performed best when rates have risen. The companies behind these stocks offer necessity goods and typically have below-average risk levels. Generally, these stocks are considered defensive. Whatever the economic situation, people need to put gas in their cars, brush their teeth, heat their homes and feed their families.