Activist fund Hudson Executive Capital's campaign at Comerica (CMA) will be a key test of whether its unusual collaborative and CEO-backed approach to activism works.
The activist fund was formed last year by Wall Street veterans Douglas Braunstein and James Woolery. They have assembled a stable of current and former CEOs, many of whom worked at Fortune 500 companies, to advise them on their targeted companies.
On Monday, Feb. 1, Hudson Executive revealed a list of seven investments, including its accumulation of a 0.8% stake in Comerica. According to investors familiar with the situation, the activists would like to see the bank consider selling itself to another midsize regional bank as part of an effort to reduce its substantial regulatory burdens, which they believe are disproportionately large when compared to the bank's size.
However, unlike other major activists including Carl Icahn, Starboard Value's Jeff Smith or Elliot Management's Paul Singer, Hudson Executive will not consider launching a proxy contest to elect directors on its targeted boards. According to investors familiar with the fund, the activists believe the capital markets are shifting lately with previously passive institutional investors becoming more active in behind-the-scenes conversations with companies. The more influential investors, they say, coupled with shareholders like Hudson, can drive investor-friendly outcomes without resorting to hostile director-election campaigns.
Advisors to activist funds aren't so sure. Andrew Freedman, partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky in New York, suggests that Hudson Executive will likely be successful in some cases where the companies they seek to collaborate with are amenable to their involvement and adopt their ideas and strategic vision. However, he contends that the firm also will face situations where their approach will hit a wall.
"In theory and on paper it's a great idea. But when it comes down to it, if a company knows that their backs won't be up against the wall facing an election contest, then the changes may not come as quickly or at all," Freedman said. "You will find boards and management teams who are advised to go along with the collaborative recommendations, but others won't feel compelled to make any changes at all."
Nevertheless, analysts believe Comerica could be ripe for the kind of M&A that activists have in mind. The Dallas bank is one of a group of about 40 large banks and other financial institutions that have been designated by regulators as "Systemically Important Financial Institutions," or SIFIs, that subject it to tough capital and liquidity requirements.
One of the smallest SIFIs, Comerica is a bank that was on The Deal's watchlist for potential activism since February 2015. It has been considered a potential target for activists who have an eye on its regulatory issues. With $68 billion in assets -- not much above a $50 billion minimum required to be considered a SIFI -- Comerica finds its regulatory costs excessively large when compared to its size.
And the bank's stock price has struggled lately, partly over energy concerns. Comerica said on Jan. 19 that it has about $3.1 billion in energy-related loans as of Dec. 31, as well as about $625 million in loans in other businesses that have a "sizable" portion of their revenue related to energy.