These 5 Mistakes Can Cost Broker-Dealers Money and Business

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Broker-dealers are making a big mistake by not paying greater attention to how they manage the fees their clients for executing trades in stocks and other financial products.

Over the past 15 years, there has been a systemic shift in the capital markets. A sector that was once dominated by a handful of exchanges and flat execution rates now sees a new exchange emerge every few months, along with complex fees that change even more frequently.

Unfortunately, many broker-dealers have failed to evolve accordingly. Many spend time and resources analyzing "best execution," low-latency solutions and new algorithms. But brokerage, clearing and exchange costs (known in the industry as "BCE") are their third-largest expenses, behind people and technology.

Broker-dealers may treat execution fees as a minor concern, but the accumulated costs of client trades are significant and can be the difference between offering quality service and falling behind. In an industry struggling with tight margins and consolidation, firms that lack the resources to stay on top of fluctuating execution costs are the most vulnerable.

For broker-dealers that face some or all of the following challenges, it's time to rethink the fee management status quo.

  • Absorbed execution-fee costs: Few broker-dealers comprehensively track execution fees on a per-client basis, often leading firms to absorb some portion of the fees. Many broker-dealers still charge clients flat rates, but these are crude estimates at best. Without visibility into the extensive attributes that factor in to any equity or options trade (e.g., penny pilots, linkage fees), firms' approximations can fall short of their actual expense. In the long term, broker-dealers that operate with this blind spot may never know what margins need to be sustained in order to remain profitable.
  • Inaccurate execution-fee invoices: Contrary to popular opinion, exchange invoices are far from infallible. Invoices can be off by as much as 20% to 50%, and a casual glance isn't enough to detect errors. When broker-dealers attempt to manage execution fees by hand, these efforts result in a jumble of spreadsheets that compound the risk of human error. Without dedicated audit teams or sophisticated software, broker-dealers can't verify the accuracy of their execution-fee invoices or charge clients appropriately.
  • Inability to measure client profitability: Broker-dealers must be able to determine how execution fees affect profitability at the individual client level to both maintain strong customer relationships and stay competitive. Though most exchanges have transitioned away from flat charges toward multivariate execution fees, many broker-dealer contracts still lag behind. As a result, the fees charged to clients are divorced from actual trade costs, threatening revenue and client trust. More problematically, firms that can't present clients with detailed invoice breakdowns upon request risk appearing incompetent or manipulative.

If you liked this article you might like

New FINRA Culture Reviews May Be Well-Intentioned, but They Are Also Flawed

What New Developments in the Consolidated Audit Trail Spell for Broker-Dealer Compliance

Broker Dealers, Here’s What Overlapping SEC and FINRA Exams Mean for You

What Broker-Dealers Need to Know About the Changing Role of Compliance Officers

Is Heyday of Broker-Dealers' Maker-Taker Model Coming to an End?