The biggest problem facing driverless technology isn't a car maker's ability to install the computer and sensors that will propel a car down an interstate at 70 mph. Both Honda and Google have already done that. The two bigger problems are:
- When driverless cars must wind through urban areas where a crisis awaits on every corner: pedestrians on cell phones, children chasing after balls and the inevitable detour or "road under construction" sign.
- The clusters of laws, customs and, of course, car insurance implications of going driverless.
The Mobility Transformation Center in Michigan
Driverless car lingo: V2V and V2ISweatman and the University of Michigan ultimately want to create a "connected environment" where cars not only see the road ahead and behind, but also where vehicles "talk" to one another and to the "interface," meaning the road on which they are driving. This is how it works: If your car is driverless -- and therefore "intelligent" -- it's aware of what's happening with other cars on the road and can stop itself at an intersection if a car coming the other way is going too fast. It helps if that car is also intelligent and signals its approach. This is known as V2V or "vehicle to vehicle" communication. But Sweatman and the MTC take this a step further. The intersection itself will "talk" to the cars. For example, the railroad crossing sign will signal to cars that a train is coming. This is called V2I or "vehicle to interface" communication.
Pedestrians could also be safer. Your smartphone would constantly send out a signal that the driverless car could recognize. If you unwittingly step out between parked cars, the oncoming driverless car will recognize the cellphone signal and brake to avoid a collision before the visual sensor on the car sees you.
Redefining the American roadAmerican roads will never be the same if the MTC, and other projects like it, succeed. Sweatman's first and foremost goal is to reduce motor-vehicle fatalities and injuries "by a factor of 10." There are about 30,800 fatal car crashes a year, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Your drive-time would be cut in half, and parking mishaps -- a major cause of fender-benders and minor accidents -- would decline as driverless cars "valeted" their drivers to the entrance of the mall, parked themselves, and then returned for pickup when signaled by a cellphone. This is why the nation's largest auto insurance company, State Farm, is staking its claim in the MTC, the only insurer to do so. (Check out Insure.com's customer satisfaction scores for State Farm.) "This could allow us to get ahead of the curve," says Carol Csanda, director of strategic resources for State Farm and a member of the MTC's leadership team. "New safety features mean that we will crash less and when we do crash, the severity will be less."
Car insurance savings not a guaranteeSo does this mean that car insurance rates will come down? Not so fast. State Farm, along with every other auto insurer, bases its rates on the millions of pieces of data it has accumulated for decades. And that won't change overnight. It will take a while before driverless-car data can make a dent in rate-setting analysis. But Csanda predicts that road tests of driverless cars could speed up the process. If State Farm gets "useful data" showing that newer cars are safer, then rates will probably come down for owners of those models. Adding all the technology to cars will also add to the price, so any car insurance savings may be offset by the additional vehicle cost.
Here are 12 ways to save on car insurance if you have an old-fashioned car -- meaning one you drive yourself.