The company, which will take LC as its ticker symbol, has generated some concern that it will create economic risks, but there's a significant gap between this skepticism and the way the company is viewed in Silicon Valley. The Silicon Valley view seems more accurate.
Must Read: 12 Stocks Warren Buffett Loves in 2014
The positive take on Lending Club is that it's a pioneer in an exciting new business known as as peer-to-peer lending. It has created a marketplace that connects people looking to lend with people seeking loans who don't necessarily satisfy traditional borrowing requirements.
By doing this, Lending Club promises to make a stodgy lending market more efficient. The biggest attraction for borrowers is that interest rates in Lending Club's marketplace are much lower than those on traditional credit cards. So these loans are much more affordable, and consumers can continue spending. That's good for the U.S.!
For lenders, this is a market that didn't exist before. It provides them the promise of safe returns in the aggregate from a pool of borrowers.
New marketplace created. Borrowers and lenders satisfied. Lending Club a successful middle man. Everyone happy.
Now let's look at the skeptics' take on Lending Club.
These loans for the most part are being made to consumers who want to refinance existing credit card debt. They might not be served by traditional lenders because they tend to be lower-income people.
No less than Sheila Bair, former chairperson of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., has complained that Lending Club relies on a scoring algorithm for borrowers but doesn't require income verification.
Right about now you may be having a flashback to the last decade, when lenders were offering mortgages that didn't require proof of income. In many cases, those loans caused borrowers to take on more risk than they could handle. Investors and Wall Street firms that held securities backed by those mortgages were exposed to huge risks when the housing bubble burst.