SAN DIEGO (RealMoney) -- When I first chatted about VirnetX (VHC) on CNBC in July 2011, when the stock was around $23 and on its way up to $40, I said this would become the next big battleground stock.
Indeed it was. Investors piled in amid the hope and hype that VirnetX, a 2007 reverse merger, would file and win a bunch of patent suits against the big-tech guns such as Microsoft (MSFT) , Cisco (CSCO) and Apple (AAPL) . It actually won a suit in 2010 against Microsoft.
As I wrote in 2012:
"The bulls believe VirnetX is setting itself up to be the next Qualcomm [ (QCOM) ] with patents, acquired from SAIC, which control secure communications between 4G mobile devices. An analyst at Cowen is in print saying he believes the patents could be valued more than $3 billion.
"Bears, meanwhile, believe that based on almost any other patent case, in any settlement VirnetX is likely to get a fraction of what the bulls expect -- assuming it wins any or all of its suits."
As it turns out, VirnetX had some impressive victories. But, as the bears predicted, the company snared a fraction of what the bulls expected. Apple was supposed to be the big win, and a jury awarded the company $368 million. But, earlier this week, an appeals court threw out that award -- or, as VirnetX put it, "remanded the damages award . . . for further proceedings."
In other words, it's back to the drawing boards.
Reality: Betting on patent fights is like betting on biotech, and the verdict of an appeals court is like getting the results of a phase III trial. For almost everybody involved, including the supposedly smart people, it's a crapshoot.
This article appeared at 10:34 a.m. EDT on RealMoney Sept. 17.
At the time of publication, Greenberg had no positions in stocks mentioned, although positions can change at any time.
Want more from Herb Greenberg? Sign up for Reality Check, his institutional research product, and get the watch list of all the companies on his radar with detailed analysis.