Media General Stock Sees Short Interest Decrease By 28.6%

The most recent short interest data has been released by the NASDAQ for the 08/29/2014 settlement date, which shows a 1,714,211 share decrease in total short interest for Media General, Inc. ( MEG), to 4,269,362, a decrease of 28.65% since 08/15/2014. Total short interest is just one way to look at short data; another metric that we here at Dividend Channel find particularly useful is the "days to cover" metric because it considers both the total shares short and the average daily volume of shares traded. The number of shares short is then compared to the average daily volume, in order to calculate the total number of trading days (at the average volume) it would take to close out all of the open short positions if every share traded represented a short position being closed. Average daily volume for MEG at the 08/29/2014 settlement increased to 507,203, as compared to 334,730 at the 08/15/2014 report. That brought "days to cover" down to 8.42, a 52.91% decrease from the 17.88 days to cover calculated at the previous short interest data release.

The below chart shows the historical "days to cover" for MEG at previous short interest release dates:

START SLIDESHOW:
Top 25 S.A.F.E. Dividend Stocks »

Loading+chart++2014+TickerTech.com

A decreased "days to cover" value could indicate that short sellers are no longer expecting the same decline in stock price they once were, or it could also indicate a long bet elsewhere was closed where MEG had been shorted as a hedge.

The chart below shows the one year performance of MEG shares, versus its 200 day moving average. Looking at this chart, MEG's low point in its 52 week range is $11.24 per share, with $23.97 as the 52 week high point — that compares with a last trade of $15.31.

If you liked this article you might like

Bids in Groundbreaking Wireless Spectrum Auction Top $18 Billion

Why It Might Be Time for Time Inc. to Sell Itself

Buffett, Once Bitten, Is No Longer Shy When It Comes to Airlines

Is Trump a Bad Omen or Simply a Black Swan for TV Political Advertising?

The 'Trump Effect' Hits TV Broadcasters