2. Also in the energy sector, Netherlands-based Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) beats ExxonMobil (XOM) in three of the four categories we looked at. Shell has a yield of 4.59% (vs. Exxon's 2.67%), and its YTD returns (17.91% vs. Exxon's 3.37%) and one-year returns (25.78% vs. Exxon's 11.67%) also dominate. On three-year returns, Shell and Exxon are close, but Exxon does edge out its counterpart at 32.01% to 27.86%.

In terms of revenue, the companies do not report precisely the same, but you can get a rough idea from the following:

  • Royal Dutch Shell (total revenue by geographical area): World: $451.235 billion; U.S. $72.552 billion; U.S. percentage 16.08%
  • Exxon Mobile (sales & operating revenue): World $420.836; U.S. $152.820; U.S. percentage 36.31%

3. In consumer staples, I put Nestle  (NSRGF) up against Hershey (HSY). The Swiss-based Nestle bests its U.S. counterpart Hershey in terms of yield (3.15% vs. Hershey's 2.31%), YTD returns (7.45% vs. Hershey's drop of 3.93%) and one-year returns (17.06% vs. Hershey's 0.50%). However, regarding three-year returns, while Nestle shows a respectable 31.03%, it is well below the 69.25% from Hershey.

In terms of total revenue by region, the companies break down as follows:

  • Nestle: Global 92.2 billion Swiss francs (about $101 billion); the Americas 40.0 billion Swiss francs (about $44 billion) (note that the U.S. is not broken out separately by Nestle); Americas percentage 43.38%
  • Hershey: Global $7.146 billion, and North America $5.960 billion (which includes the U.S. and Canada); North America percentage 83.40%.

Hershey did note that sales outside the U.S. and Canada increased approximately 15.7% year-over-year.

4. In the information technology sector, I like to compare SAP (SAP) to Oracle  (ORCL). The German SAP's yield (1.69% vs. Oracle's 1.19%) and three-year returns (41.53% vs. Oracle's 29.34%) beat those of its U.S. counterpart. However, in all fairness, Oracle can boast better YTD returns (-5.71% for SAP vs. 6.38% for Oracle) as well as one-year returns (11.09% for SAP vs. 26.19% for Oracle).

In terms of total revenues by region the number are as follows:

  • SAP: Global 16.814 billion euros ($22.6 billion); U.S. 4.661 billion euros ($6.2 billion); U.S. percentage 27.72%.
  • Oracle: Global $32.275 billion; the Americas $20.323 billion (Note that the U.S. is not broken out separately); Americas percentage 62.97%.

Although they are both major players in all sectors of "big data," in terms of worldwide enterprise resource planning software market share, SAP's 25% is nearly double that of Oracle's 13%. Certainly it can be shown that SAP, like all the above mentioned international companies, has worldwide sales more diverse than its U.S. competitor.

For these as well as the other reasons mentioned, I would always advise that, where appropriate, you consider internationally based companies that are comparable to their U.S.-counterparts to see if one of the other might give your portfolio an edge up on pure domestic plays.

At the time of publication, the author held no positions in any of the stocks mentioned, although positions may change at any time.

This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.


TheStreet Ratings team rates CHEVRON CORP as a Buy with a ratings score of A-. TheStreet Ratings Team has this to say about their recommendation:

"We rate CHEVRON CORP (CVX) a BUY. This is based on the convergence of positive investment measures, which should help this stock outperform the majority of stocks that we rate. The company's strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its largely solid financial position with reasonable debt levels by most measures, attractive valuation levels, good cash flow from operations and increase in stock price during the past year. We feel these strengths outweigh the fact that the company has had somewhat weak growth in earnings per share."

Highlights from the analysis by TheStreet Ratings Team goes as follows:

  • CVX's debt-to-equity ratio is very low at 0.15 and is currently below that of the industry average, implying that there has been very successful management of debt levels. Along with the favorable debt-to-equity ratio, the company maintains an adequate quick ratio of 1.02, which illustrates the ability to avoid short-term cash problems.
  • Net operating cash flow has increased to $8,417.00 million or 47.30% when compared to the same quarter last year. The firm also exceeded the industry average cash flow growth rate of 18.80%.
  • CVX, with its decline in revenue, slightly underperformed the industry average of 1.5%. Since the same quarter one year prior, revenues slightly dropped by 6.2%. Weakness in the company's revenue seems to have hurt the bottom line, decreasing earnings per share.
  • In its most recent trading session, CVX has closed at a price level that was not very different from its closing price of one year earlier. This is probably due to its weak earnings growth as well as other mixed factors. Turning our attention to the future direction of the stock, it goes without saying that even the best stocks can fall in an overall down market. However, in any other environment, this stock still has good upside potential despite the fact that it has already risen in the past year.

If you liked this article you might like

Energy Takes a Backseat as Crude Oil Stabilizes Under $50

China Might Ban the Gas-Powered Car

France Is About to Ban Oil Production and No One Will Even Notice

Gasoline Prices Stabilizing as Some Refineries Get Back Up to Speed