Short Interest Decreases By 11.4% For BCO

The most recent short interest data has been released by the NASDAQ for the 06/30/2014 settlement date, which shows a 596,094 share decrease in total short interest for Brinks Co ( BCO), to 4,609,873, a decrease of 11.45% since 06/13/2014. Total short interest is just one way to look at short data; another metric that we here at Dividend Channel find particularly useful is the "days to cover" metric because it considers both the total shares short and the average daily volume of shares traded. The number of shares short is then compared to the average daily volume, in order to calculate the total number of trading days (at the average volume) it would take to close out all of the open short positions if every share traded represented a short position being closed. Average daily volume for BCO at the 06/30/2014 settlement increased to 1,186,884, as compared to 292,369 at the 06/13/2014 report. That brought "days to cover" down to 3.88, a 78.19% decrease from the 17.81 days to cover calculated at the previous short interest data release.

The below chart shows the historical "days to cover" for BCO at previous short interest release dates:

Top 25 S.A.F.E. Dividend Stocks »

A decreased "days to cover" value could indicate that short sellers are no longer expecting the same decline in stock price they once were, or it could also indicate a long bet elsewhere was closed where BCO had been shorted as a hedge.

The chart below shows the one year performance of BCO shares, versus its 200 day moving average. Looking at this chart, BCO's low point in its 52 week range is $24.25 per share, with $35.73 as the 52 week high point — that compares with a last trade of $27.10.

If you liked this article you might like

Brink's May Not Truck Ahead Much Longer

What to Watch During the Week: Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap (Friday 7/7/17)

Cramer: Top 10 Reasons Why the Bull Market Is Mistrusted

Starboard Value's Jeff Smith Is Top Activist for Naming New Board Members

Starboard's Smith Leads Activists in Naming Dissident Directors