NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Self-driving/driverless cars are being embraced by such companies as Google (GOOG), Tesla (TSLA) and Intel (INTC). But no matter how reliable the technology becomes, driverless cars cab never succeed.
Why? Legal liability, or the question of who pays when something goes wrong.
The top three causes of distracted driving in the United States, according to Drivers.com, are drunk driving, speeding and distracted driving. According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, at least 32,800 people died in 2013 in car crashes, and most of those accidents were caused by human error.
Courtesy of Google
The concept of the driverless car is beautiful: eliminate human error by eliminating the human. When a driver has an accident, someone has to be at fault. But who or what is to blame when a driverless car goes haywire and (to use a hypothetical example from the new book Think Like a Freak), mows down an entire pre-school class?
In such an example if it was raining heavily, some of the responsibility might lie with the car's owner. But ultimately the liability will probably lie with the automaker.
In releasing a driverless car, an automaker is taking on an exhorbanant amount of risk and liability. When a Toyota (TM) software bug in braking software caused several accidents, Toyota was forced to do a recall that cost the automaker $2 billion, according to the BBC. In addition, the automaker was forced to pay a $1.2 billion settlement to the victims of the issue.