CEO Tim Cook has boosted the shares with a stock split, stock buyback and dividend hike, drawing in tons of money looking for "safe" gains. But ultimately tech companies must grow, change and evolve to survive, and Apple is apparently out of ideas.
When you're buying out a small peripherals company and streaming site for $3.2 billion, it means you don't think your own efforts can create that value. It means you just faced the buy-or-make decision and decided you had to buy.
Our Brian Sozzi insisted that this is a great deal for Apple. He loves Beats President Luke Wood. He thinks the Beats headphones will add "cool" to Apple's line. He thinks Beats has other ideas Apple can now implement.
But that's precisely my point. Cook is buying music imagination because he can't create it from scratch within his own company. And that should have Apple shareholders shaking in their iShoes.
Cook made Apple a buy by transforming it from a growth company to an extractive company, from a company focused on the top line to one focused on the bottom line. Since he became CEO on Aug. 24, 2011, the stock is up 59%, it has paid out more than $21.50 in dividends on each share of stock, and it has cut its float to just 865 million shares, presplit.
But the company's price-to-earnings multiple, the amount investors will pay for its earnings, has remained range-bound. It's currently about 14. Most of the recent gains are due to changing investor fashion, a general preference for dividends over growth, not to anything Apple is doing that's exciting anyone.
A piece of Sondheim's Sunday in the Park With George is appropriate here. "Chromolume #7?" Or, we might say, iPhone number 6? The whole point of the play's second act is that the artist is looking for inspiration outside himself when he should be looking inside, making what he does produce derivative.
Where is the Apple TV? Where is the Apple watch? Where is the next Apple revolution?