NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- That the business oligarch Warren Buffett plays his cards close to his chest is a known fact. But, even to those who follow him closely to the extent of predicting his next move, his recent "controversy" over not voting against an equity compensation plan for employees of Coca-Cola (KO) was a rather unexpected move.
Having always stood in stern opposition to "excessive" compensation in the corporate world, Buffett left both his supporters and opposers with a huge question on why he did what he did.
His abstention, in more ways than one, helped get a generous compensation doled out to approximately 6,500 employees of Coca-Cola company; of which CEO Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) is the biggest shareholder. However, just a little while later, the CEO "expressed" his displeasure over the compensation plan, calling it "excessive." And that, with his abstention, he wanted to send a strong message that he was "not for it."
A rather curious case, isn't it?
>>Read more: Tim Cook's Biggest Failure at Apple
When quizzed as to why he stayed out of it, instead of being vocal about his opposition to the compensation plan, Buffett said he simply "didn't want to express disapproval to the management by voting against the plan."
Loaded with huge dollops of ambiguity, this move by 83-year-old Buffett shows he is still the classy, astute businessman who will always cover his tracks, in my opinion. A seeded player, Buffett has known how to change the course of the game, without ruining his chances. To bolster his stand, Buffett at the annual meeting of shareholders of Berkshire Hathaway maintained that "going to war" wouldn't yield much and that his abstention sent an even stronger a message.