Size matters most
Best vehicles for protecting passengers from injuries
Worst vehicles for protecting passengers from injuries
Source: Insure.com. See the methodology of our annual car insurance rates study.
The Ford F-350 weighs 3 tons, nearly three times what a Toyota Yaris weighs.In crashes with roadside objects, such as trees or poles, it's more likely that a heavier vehicle will be able to move the object, reducing the severity of the crash for the occupants. In addition, larger vehicles have more "crush space" in the front end, which helps vehicles keep the forces of the crash away from the seating area. More crush space means it takes longer for the vehicle to come to a complete stop in the crash. This helps an occupant ride down the crash over a longer period, reducing the severity of the impact on the body. Asked which vehicle he would buy, Rader says, "We can't single out one vehicle as being the safest. If safety is a priority, consumers should avoid the smallest, lightest cars available. It's better to start with midsize or larger models with good crash test-ratings from the Institute and the federal government."
Why the price tag matters
Least safe for passengers: Toyota Yaris
These European luxury manufacturers seem to be the carmakers that pay the most attention not just to passing mandated government crash-safety tests, but also to conducting their own research into other types of crash modes that cause injury and death, he says. "They do the research, and consequently design their vehicles to help prevent those injuries and deaths," he reports.The point he makes is borne out by the inclusion of the Porsche Cayenne, Volvo XC90 and BMW X1 on the list, he argues. "None of those three vehicles are the size or the mass of the Escalade," he adds. "Yet we see them ranked in the top 10 for preventing injury."
The most injuriesVehicles associated with the greatest number of injuries are in general compact cars and midsize cars, sometimes referred to as C and D Class cars. With these C and D Class automobiles, "there's a lot more pressure on price, and thinner profit margins," Leiss says. "Unfortunately, the result is it becomes more difficult to make the business case that they will have the side airbags you see in larger vehicles. Safety takes a backseat to profits." In an accident between a 3,000-pound car and a 5,000-pound car, the larger car "is going to win," Leiss says. That means the smaller car starts out at a disadvantage, and then is further disadvantaged by being equipped with comparatively fewer safety features than found on larger cars. The one surprise for Leiss on the worst cars for preventing injuries list is the Toyota Camry. "The Camry is one of the best-selling vehicles in the overall vehicle market, typically No. 1 or 2 in sales of sedans," Leiss says. "The other vehicles in that list are smaller vehicles, which from a physics standpoint are at a disadvantage in collisions with other vehicles. But the Camry is a midsize, which typically weighs 500 to 700 pounds more than subcompact and compact vehicles, with more room between occupant and a hard surface."
The more hopeful news for those preferring small vehicles is that the once yawning gap between large and small vehicle safety features has closed dramatically in recent years, according to Leiss. "Part of what we see is technology filtering down from larger to smaller cars," he adds. "What we've been seeing the last few years is that smaller cars are catching up. You see smaller cars with, for instance, 10 air bags, and strong safety cages."