Steve Jobs Would Have Loved the Horrible Thing Samsung Did When He Died

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- There's a tinge of outrage on Twitter (TWTR) over emails from the Apple (AAPL)/Samsung trial showing the latter aimed to take advantage of Steve Jobs's death.

Apparently Samsung execs lamented "an unintended benefit" of Jobs's passing, pointing to unabashed tributes to the ingenuity, beauty and workmanship of iPhone. However, they also saw the event as their "best opportunity to attack iPhone," at least according to Samsung's VP of Sales at the time.

I'm a big fan of Jonny Evans' work over at Computerworld, but he's making too much of an apparent contradiction in the ways Samsung executives reacted after Jobs passed away:

While Jobs lived, Samsung policy was not to engage in directly critical advertising, but this restriction was lifted at around the same time as he died. Such a change in policy must have been taken at the highest levels of the company.
This begs the question, did (Samsung CEO) Cho Gee-sung agree to this policy change even as he remembered Jobs', "innovative spirit and remarkable accomplishments"? ...
I find it difficult to believe senior management were unaware of the decision, particularly in light of the long-standing relationships between Jobs and Samsung's biggest leaders. If they were aware, then was it ethical for them to mourn Jobs so publicly given they saw Apple's loss as such an opportunity?

Seems to me this type of thing would actually be right up Steve Jobs's alley.

If you liked this article you might like

Apple Watch Issues Pull Nasdaq to Session Lows, Dow and S&P 500 in Flux

How Facebook Is Trying to Avoid a Public Relations Disaster with Songwriters

Apple's Tim Cook Calls DACA, Immigration 'Biggest Issue of Our Time'

The Wait for 'Milestone' Fed Meeting Keeps Stocks in Flux

Apple Stock Falls as Series 3 Watch Connectivity Issues Come to Light