Nearly a week after publication the article still trends -- when the algorithmic winds blow the right way -- near the top of TheStreet's charts. Of course, the subject matter welcomes divisiveness, as evidenced by independent submissions of the piece to the popular social sharing service Reddit:
It's a "piece" alright. A masterpiece to Apple (AAPL) fans and those who understand what has made Apple great. And a piece of absolute crap to Apple haters who present Google's (GOOG) Android marketshare as support for their seemingly righteous, yet horribly misguided hate for Apple.
And make no mistake. That's what the negative response is all about -- hate for Apple. Because nobody could possibly love Android.
A few lines from a Jay Yarow report at Business Insider (via Yahoo! (YHOO) Finance) ring relevant here. Yarow was writing in response to the rumor that Apple would like to make iPhone 6 $100 more expensive than previous models:
Because the iPhone is the only phone that matters this year, carriers may cave and give Apple the price bump it wants ...
This seems like a strange move for Apple. At a time when its rivals are going down in price, Apple wants to go up.
So instead of a starting price of $199 on a two-year contract (the way it is with iPhone 5s), Apple wants $299 as the introductory price point. And the wireless carriers don't like the idea.
Neither here nor there prediction -- it'll be a $249 phone. It's neither here nor there because, as Yarow stated, "the iPhone is the only phone that matters this year."
Apple focuses on nothing other than producing the best hardware it possibly can, regardless of what its "rivals" do. As I noted in the demolish article, do not confuse concern over Android with panic. If it was iPhone 5 or 5s would have been a large-screen model. But Apple has waited for a reason.
It wants to get it right. It wants to sneak attack Google. Killing Android with a scalpel not a sledgehammer and hatchet. Almost as if keeping Android's trend line in the down direction was an unintended consequence. Something that just sort of happened as Apple was going about its business.
Apple doesn't want to produce the smartphone equivalent of Microsoft's (MSFT) answer to the iPad. The Surface tablet failed despite Steve Ballmer's misleading pump jobs. (Where was/is the SEC on that noise, by the way?). It failed because it was a poorly conceived and terribly executed non-answer to something bigger than a piece of hardware. iPad -- big and small -- creates an experience unlike any other mobile device on the market. Apple wants to ensure that when it does a bigger smartphone screen, it not only does it right, but to an extent that makes all that came before iPhone 6 look and feel obsolete.
That's what Apple's about to do with iPhone 6. In relation to specifications, as TheStreet's Richard Saintvilus nicely outlined last week, but, more importantly, with respect to the experience.
If an iPhone's less sexy today than it was 2, 3, 5 years ago, it's not because of Android. It's because of Apple. In many respects, I still believe iPhone does not need to be revolutionary, however I also understand the power of change not merely for the sake of change, but to shake up the experience.
When iPhone 5s came out, I "couldn't" get one. I still had roughly one year remaining on my two-year wireless contract with Verizon (VZ). While I would have probably upgraded anyway if I was eligible (that's just how I am), I never feel shortchanged by the iPhone 5 when I compare it to the iPhone 5s. For all intents and purposes, they're the same phone. This assessment probably holds for most people.
Competing against the standard it has set for itself, Apple probably can't afford to have iPhone 5s owners, for instance, feel the same way with respect to iPhone 6. It's not that Apple has to out-wow Android consumers; it has to reignite the uncontrollable aspirational urge to upgrade among its devotees.
That's the focus. Not some overhyped concern over what Google's hardware partners do with Android-based devices.
The Apple consumer's love affair with the iPhone has become routine. The missionary position every night of the week. Oh. Nice. Another iPhone. For most companies, tepid excitement Apple style would be fantastic. But that's not the case when Apple measures itself against Apple. It needs to find that spark again. And there's no better way to do it than by recreating the iPhone experience just enough ... to the point where it shifts expectations vis-a-vis the smartphone experience.
This is Apple's position of strength -- a more than stable, world-beating iPhone (and iPad) business that gives it the ability to not have to chase the so-called competition. As long as it stays true to itself at the same time as it outdoes itself, it'll be OK. Tall order, yes. But it has become the Apple way.
How anybody could argue against the notion of "the only phone that matters this year" further eroding Android's declining marketshare is beyond me. It's not like when you predict iPhone will demolish Android, you're saying Google sucks. Quite the contrary.
Google's as strong a company as Apple. Just in a different way. It's not doing hardware the right way (and it knows it) because hardware isn't the endgame for Google. Search, software and services represents Google's grail. A scattered hardware strategy is merely one of many means to make it holy. Google's a bit like Amazon.com (AMZN) in that regard.
It's in Google's DNA to be a marketshare company. Considering Google's roots in search, that's not a surprise. Most of the other important things Google does, outside of Glass and other relative larks, require marketshare. Again ... just like search.
But there's a problem with this Google strategy. It likely won't hurt it's core, but it makes it vulnerable to losing further Android marketshare, particularly in the United States.
When you farm hardware production out to less-than others, you spread yourself thin. Ultimately, there's no there there. It's for this reason Apple can effectively compete with Samsung with one phone (and a couple older models). Google allows Android to power dozens and dozens of devices. None remarkable enough to differentiate themselves from the pack. This dynamic gives Apple the ability to do what I think it will do (and Saintvilus alluded to) with iPhone 6:
Come hard with a clear and distinct message.
Bigger screen option. Fastest smartphone on the market. Ability to multitask. Improved Maps. Improved Siri. Mobile payments capability. Whatever Apple has up its sleeve will get iPhone diehards talking again. The lines will be long. The rest of the world will watch. Apple will reclaim ownership of the halo effect.
When Apple outdoes itself -- as it has since Steve Jobs introduced iPod -- things pretty much goes down exactly that way. It doesn't gobble marketshare as much as it chips away at it. Swoops in. Owns a market. Others dilute that market. And then, because quality and loyalty trump the marketshare ploy, Apple trends up while the others trend down. Apple's always in charge of putting the writing on the wall.
This article won't make sense to about half of the people who read it. But by the end of 2014 it will. "Demolish" will seem much less inflammatory in January 2015 than it did in April 2014. If it doesn't, we'll reserve a room for you at Bellevue -- they'll be waiting for you there with their oxygen masks -- next to the few remaining BlackBerry (BBRY) diehards. Sitting there. Mumbling to themselves.
--Written by Rocco Pendola in Santa Monica, Calif.