NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- I was speaking to Joe Deaux today about the Barron's cover story predicting oil prices would see $75 in the next five years. My view couldn't be more different.

Barron's used two correct facts to make its case for falling oil prices: First, it recognized the massive growth in North American oil production from Canadian oil sands, U.S. fracking of oil from shale and deep water production from the Gulf of Mexico. Second, they predict, I think correctly, a transition to more use of natural gas and renewables, displacing oil demand. Both of these factors, they contend, will lead to a collapsing of world oil prices in the next five years.

But while Barron's is, I believe, right on these two energy trends, they are wrong on how they will likely impact price.

While Barron's is right that there has been an explosion in new production of oil here in North America, what the authors of the cover story seem to forget is that it was specifically higher trending prices that allowed those technologies to develop. As the amount of oil from traditional wells decreases, the percentage of supply coming from unconventional shale plays and deep water must increase.

But these barrels are expensive to produce, sometimes 10 to 15 times more expensive. There are several sources of unconventional oil that are uneconomic to be developed unless oil remains above $100 a barrel and some that need even $120 or more. If prices drop much below that threshold, oil companies will simply refuse to produce them.

If you liked this article you might like

Oil Will Turn Soon, But Not All Oil Companies Will Follow

It's Finally Time to Look at Oil Stocks

Don't Buy Into the 'New Normal' Oil Hype

An Oil Certainty: Higher Prices, Lower Supply

Why Barron's Has It Wrong on Oil