JPMorgan Whines: 'We Lost a Leader Because We're Overregulated'

NEW YORK (TheStreet) --Never a bank to miss an opportunity, JPMorgan Chase  (JPM) is trying to make lemons into lemonade by using the departure of a key executive to continue its endless lobbying for lighter regulations.

Want the scoop on why Mike Cavanaugh, seen as a potential successor to Jamie Dimon, left the company to join The Carlyle Group (CG)?

"People close to him" told The Wall Street Journal that "Mr. Cavanagh's decision was partly motivated by the bank's legal and regulatory battles."

And people "who insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly," told The New York Times that "in weighing his choices, Mr. Cavanagh winced at the idea of facing similar scrutiny one day if he became chief executive."

The Times story, presumably driven by its Dealbook persona, also includes this gem:

"Industry analysts worry that the lure of private equity firms and other players could siphon some of the most capable executives away from overseeing banks that are critically important to the economy."

It is followed by a quote from a Moody's analyst warning that "if intellectual capital starts getting drained out of the industry, that is something we will be paying attention to."

Stories by Reuters and Bloomberg, among others, include similar spin.

But guess what, folks? Top executives have been fleeing big banks for private equity firms, hedge funds and M&A boutiques for years-long before the 2008 crisis.

Is regulatory scrutiny a factor in executives' decisions? Probably, but the overwhelming factor has got to be money. That's how top financial services executives measure themselves. They all have more than they need to buy whatever they want. But why should I settle for $10 million when the joker who used to sit next to me just made the Forbes billionaires list?

If banks are losing "intellectual capital" because regulators are forcing them to be more boring, so be it. The reason they are removing the risks from these institutions is that even the intellectuals--sorry, I just find the use of that word too funny--couldn't run them.

So now the talk is that Gordon Smith, a former American Express  (AXP) executive, may be groomed as Dimon's successor. He doesn't have an investment banking background, and so hasn't been knee-deep in the dark arts of derivatives trades that lost JPMorgan $6.2 billion during the 2012 London Whale debacle. Fine. But those trades are now supposedly illegal under the Volcker Rule anyway, assuming regulators wrote the rule correctly and actually enforce the rule. And if they don't, well, that's why banks are holding more capital. Because let's remember who was running JPMorgan when it botched those trades: the great intellectual known as Jamie Dimon 

Follow @dan_freed

Disclosure: TheStreet's editorial policy prohibits staff editors, reporters and analysts from holding positions in any individual stocks.

If you liked this article you might like

Closing Bell: LIVE MARKETS BLOG

Closing Bell: LIVE MARKETS BLOG

Cardinal Health: Why We're Not Worried About Amazon

Cardinal Health: Why We're Not Worried About Amazon

Financial Stocks Make Great Buys After the Recent Market Downdraft

Financial Stocks Make Great Buys After the Recent Market Downdraft

This Is the Perfect Time to Buy Dividend Stocks

This Is the Perfect Time to Buy Dividend Stocks

Citigroup Gives CEO Corbat 48% Pay Raise as Profitability Misses Goal

Citigroup Gives CEO Corbat 48% Pay Raise as Profitability Misses Goal