Here's Why Facebook Is Better Than Twitter

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- TheStreet's Herb Greenberg made some good points earlier this week with respect to why, as he puts it, Twitter (TWTR) "struggle(s) with user engagement." Or, as I would put it, why, relative to Facebook (FB), "nobody" uses Twitter.

While I tend to agree with most of what Herb said, nothing he listed about the unintuitive Twitter platform should serve as an obstacle to growth or engagement. If Twitter intrigued the average user of social media enough, they would figure it out. Just like anything else.

If my Mother can make the shift from Facebook on the desktop of an old Dell to Facebook mobile on an iPad, anybody can learn the seemingly elusive ins and outs of Twitter.

There's an overarching problem at play. One that doesn't have a whole lot to do with digital prowess. It's not simply that Twitter's tough to make sense of. It's that it's a highly pretentious environment comprised of a series of cliques, dominated by media members, celebrities and tech insiders.

It's just not very inviting. So why would the average person -- at the scale of Facebook's user base -- want to invest the time to learn how to navigate a place where they don't feel wanted.

Consider the following series of Tweets from Twitter user (and, in full disclosure, my friend, Craig Scott):

If you liked this article you might like

AI Pioneer Andrew Ng: There's Room for Multiple Winners in the AI Race

Why Amazon's Reported Smart Glasses Might Be Just a Niche Product -- For Now

Why Apple Pay Cash Won't Be a Venmo Killer: PayPal CEO

Dow, S&P 500 Set New Records as Fed Moves to Unwind Balance Sheet

PayPal Has Billions in Cash and Is On the Prowl for Acquisitions