Here's Why Facebook Is Better Than Twitter

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- TheStreet's Herb Greenberg made some good points earlier this week with respect to why, as he puts it, Twitter (TWTR) "struggle(s) with user engagement." Or, as I would put it, why, relative to Facebook (FB), "nobody" uses Twitter.

While I tend to agree with most of what Herb said, nothing he listed about the unintuitive Twitter platform should serve as an obstacle to growth or engagement. If Twitter intrigued the average user of social media enough, they would figure it out. Just like anything else.

If my Mother can make the shift from Facebook on the desktop of an old Dell to Facebook mobile on an iPad, anybody can learn the seemingly elusive ins and outs of Twitter.

There's an overarching problem at play. One that doesn't have a whole lot to do with digital prowess. It's not simply that Twitter's tough to make sense of. It's that it's a highly pretentious environment comprised of a series of cliques, dominated by media members, celebrities and tech insiders.

It's just not very inviting. So why would the average person -- at the scale of Facebook's user base -- want to invest the time to learn how to navigate a place where they don't feel wanted.

Consider the following series of Tweets from Twitter user (and, in full disclosure, my friend, Craig Scott):

If you liked this article you might like

How to Invest Just Like a Millionaire

Snapchat Maintains Edge Over Instagram in U.S. Signups, But Not for Long

WhatsApp Rejects UK Demand for Access to Encrypted Messages

Facebook Could Be Back in China in 2018

Amazon, Google and Other U.S. Tech Giants Face a Battle Over Taxes With Europe