NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Among the more than 300 responses to my opinion essay on why the arrest of "El Chapo" was a mistake, more than a few rephrased my argument to state that "El Chapo" was too big to fail.
The connection hadn't occurred to me, but since I have spent some 14 years covering Wall Street it certainly got my attention.
First of all, let's not mince words: The commenters were right on the money in interpreting my remarks. As former U.S. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson argued in justifying his bailout of the U.S. financial system, including thuggish Wall Street banks like Goldman Sachs (GS) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM), I was absolutely arguing that a world without "El Chapo" running his drug cartel would be worse than the effect of leaving him in place.
This is not an easy truth to stomach. How can we simply look the other way while a vast criminal enterprise carries out its business unchecked?
One could argue JPMorgan and the other big banks have done the same thing. Such an argument may seem facile to many.
Were the big banks really criminal enterprises? Well, as U.S. Judge Jed Rakoff pointed out earlier this year, the U.S. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission effectively said they were. Rakoff found that body's final report "uses variants of the word 'fraud' no fewer than 157 times in describing what led to the crisis, concluding that there was a 'systemic breakdown,' not just in accountability, but also in ethical behavior."