Galena Biopharma Pays For Stock-Touting Campaign While Insiders Cash Out Millions

This story has been updated from 9:49 AM EST with additional information.

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Two articles touting Galena Biopharma (GALE) were removed from Seeking Alpha Monday because they were written by the same person using different aliases.

This is the second time Seeking Alpha has been forced to take action against individuals using multiple aliases to tout Galena, a small drug developer with a breast cancer vaccine in a phase III study. In January 2013, the investor Web site removed five articles promoting Galena written by the same individual under three different pseudonyms.

The most recent incident is more serious and potentially damaging because of evidence linking Galena to a stock-promotions firm which wrote and published the articles on Seeking Alpha. The articles were part of a broader, coordinated "brand awareness campaign" designed to boost Galena's stock price, according to a document obtained by TheStreet.

Aided by this promotional campaign, Galena shares tripled in value from this summer. Coincidence or not, Galena insiders have made millions of dollars by selling company stock in January.

Galena did not respond to phone calls and emails seeking comment.

In July 2013, Galena paid $50,000 to a subsidiary of The DreamTeam Group for 240 days of "advertising, branding, marketing, investor relations and social media services," according to a disclaimer on The DreamTeam Group's Web site.

[Update: Following publication of this story, DreamTeam Group removed the Galena compensation disclosure from its web site. Here is the screen shot disclosing Galena's payment to DreamTeam Group.]



Publicly traded companies routinely pitch their stock to new investors, but some of DreamTeam's marketing tactics appear to resemble stock promotion schemes which run afoul of standard investor relations practices. Among its other services, DreamTeam Group operates more than two dozen investor Web sites with names like "Home Run Stocks," "Touchdown Stocks," "Quality Stocks," and "Tout Sheet." The Web sites entice investors with stock picks that can "trade for at least a 100% profit."

All the stock picks touted on these DreamTeam Web sites, including Galena, are paying clients -- a fact omitted from the Web sites unless someone clicks on a small disclaimer link.

Galena was promoted on many of the DreamTeam stock-touting Web sites to create "market buzz about the company to a new group of investors," according to a DreamTeam document, "Galena Biopharma Case Study: Investor Awareness Campaign" obtained by TheStreet.

As part of this campaign, DreamTeam published favorable articles about Galena on Seeking Alpha on Aug. 7, 2013 and Nov. 22, 2013, according to the case-study document. But the articles were written under aliases and make no mention of DreamTeam or its paid marketing relationship with Galena. Instead, they're written from the perspective of individual investors recommending an investment in Galena to other readers of Seeking Alpha.

"... investors must look for biopharmaceutical companies that have a unique approach to science, a deep pipeline, drugs with huge market potential, and a healthy fundamental picture. Galena has all of these attributes and shareholders with patience will be handsomely rewarded in due time," is how the author "Wonderful Wizard" pitches Galena to Seeking Alpha readers in the article, headlined "Galena Biopharma Presents an Attractive Investment Opportunity," [The article was actually published on Aug. 6.]

On Nov. 22, "Kingmaker" published a similar article on Seeking Alpha titled, "Galena Biopharma Continues to Develop a Deep Pipeline of Products." Neither article disclosed a financial relationship with DreamTeam Group or Galena.

Both articles were removed from Seeking Alpha on Monday because they were written by the same person.

"We pulled the Aug. 6 and Nov. 22 articles. Upon investigation, the contributor was in violation of our Terms of Use because 'Kingmaker' and 'Wonderful Wizard' were the same person but failed to tell us so," said Seeking Alpha Vice President of Content and Editor in Chief Eli Hoffman.

Seeking Alpha was unable to determine if the author was paid by DreamTeam Group to write the two articles on Galena, added Hoffman. Hoffman would not disclose the real identify of the author publishing under the "Kingmaker" and "Wonderful Wizard" aliases.

If you liked this article you might like

For These Small-Cap Biotech CEOs, Stock Promotion, Not Drug Development, Was Priority No. 1

How to Dig Deep for Value in These Exuberant Markets

Value Investors Have to Go Deeper

Gilead Sciences Leads Biotech Movers -- Plus Jim Cramer's Comments