Is Soupman the Big Winner From Super Bowl Advertising?

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Super Bowl commercials from the usual suspects Coca-Cola (KO), Anheuser-Busch Inbev (BUD), Verizon (VZ) and Amazon (AMZN) all made points with consumers. 

Even beleaguered RadioShack  (RSH) scored high with its commercial touting the renovation of its stores. But the publicly traded company that looks to gain the most from the Super Bowl over the long term was an over-the-counter company without a commercial, Soupman Inc. (SOUP).

RadioShack destroyed whatever momentum it generated from its commercial when the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this week that the Fort Worth, Texas-based electronics retailer plans to close 500 of its roughly 4,300 stores. Soupman, by contrast, has adroitly maneuvered to prolong the buzz about its soup.

For fans of the legendary comedy series, Seinfeld, Soupman needs no introduction. This is the company that has evolved from the revered Soup Nazi episode into a product that The New York Times has described as "Art, not soup." Soupman has received the highest rating from Zagat, and was served at MetLife Stadium on game day and at other Super Bowl events.

Soupman didn't need to spend millions of dollars on a Super Bowl commercial to attract buzz. It achieved everything a company its size needed to fuel a national, or semi-national, rollout by good old-fashioned event marketing.

Unlike RadioShack, Soupman posts a gross profit. Revenue for the three-month period ended in November rose to $1.1 million from $790,000. On a much larger scale, RadioShack's revenue is falling by more than 10%.

If you liked this article you might like

How to Get Rich Using Warren Buffett's Favorite Stock Market Indicators

Brigham Young University Sells Caffeinated Coke Drinks for the First Time Ever

How to Live Just Like Billionaire Warren Buffett

How to Make a Deal Like Billionaire Investor Warren Buffett

How to Invest Like Billionaire Warren Buffett