The Fed and the Exodus From Bond ETFs

NEW YORK (ETF Expert) -- The familiar pattern of May-June gloom for stocks only led to a 5% selloff in 2013. Bonds, however, witnessed a repricing that many had not seen since 1994. Intermediate-term Treasuries lost 7% to 8%. Munis fell more than 10%. Meanwhile, investors trampled emerging market bonds for 12% to14%.

Why did people redeem assets from bond funds so quickly? Why did the pace of those redemptions create liquidity issues for the fixed-income marketplace?

In brief, the Federal Reserve had hinted that it might slow down the rate of its quantitative easing experiment of buying bonds to push rates lower. Consequently, the 10-year yield nearly doubles from 1.6% to 3% in an extremely short time frame.

Many are now suggesting that a future crash in bond funds is a near certainty. They maintain that when rates rise -- not if they rise -- bond mutual funds and bond ETFs will not be able to handle the selling due to a lack of liquidity in the underlying assets.

Indeed, during the height of this year's chaos, municipal bond ETFs like PowerShares National Muni ( PZA) and iShares S&P National Muni ( MUB) were trading at net asset value discounts of 300 basis points for at least a week. In the world of exchange-traded investing, premiums and discounts are supposed to be negligible.

Courtesy of StockCharts.com

It is probably accurate to say that an erratic jump in fixed-income yields would cause trouble for bond funds yet again. As investors liquidate fixed-income fund positions, the huge number of bonds hitting the marketplace would likely overwhelm bond dealers and the liquidity of the bonds themselves.

On the other hand, the Federal Reserve walked back "taper talk" in late June as it became clear that bond selling had been getting away from their control (and manipulation). Volatility notwithstanding, muni price depreciation has abated and muni tax-free income has been valuable ever since.

Courtesy of StockCharts.com

It follows that the central bank of the United States is aware of its power, not only to cause panic but also to quell panic. In fact, in a world where nearly all of the major banks are fostering exceptionally low interest rates -- in a global environment where the low-rate trend is likely to push forward into 2016, 2017, and 2018 -- a bond fund crash is unlikely. Rising interest rates? Sure. An overnight spike where rates nearly double (the way they did from 1.6% to 3%)? Not probable.

Central banks like the U.S. Federal Reserve did underestimate the magnitude of the lack of liquidity in mortgage backed securities in 2008; for that matter, they were not even able to see the recessionary pressures of real estate or the problems with interest-only loans until the crisis began hitting epic proportions. On the other hand, the Fed successfully suppressed market fears in the 1998 Asian currency crisis. Similarly, since October 2011, the "do what it takes" Draghi-led European Central Bank has provided a multi-year lifeline to the beleaguered euro-zone.

Do central banks really succeed when they bail out countries and regions? Should they even engage in rescue operations to squash rapid depreciation in asset classes? Those are philosophical questions with answers that may not become evident for decades, or even centuries.

From my vantage point, though, the U.S. Fed continues to inflate a balloon that will be challenging to deflate slowly over the next five years. In fact, I doubt whether the Fed will ever decide to deflate the balloon at all; rather, as long as the dollar holds up, as long as foreign investors do not dump U.S. debt, I expect "tapering" to be replaced with yet another round of quantitative bond-buying easing (a la QE4).

Granted, Janet Yellen recently claimed in her testimony before Congress that the Fed realizes QE cannot last forever. Nevertheless, with such a remarkably low tolerance for recession and zero fiscal stimulus coming down the pike, QE is going to be a saving grace for stocks and for bonds for years to come; that is, while a stock or bond bear is always a possibility in the near-term, an epic collapse will not occur unless investors everywhere lose confidence in the rescuing capabilities of the world's central banks.

This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.

Disclosure Statement: ETF Expert is a website that makes the world of ETFs easier to understand. Gary Gordon, Pacific Park Financial and/or its clients may hold positions in ETFs, mutual funds and investment assets mentioned. The commentary does not constitute individualized investment advice. The opinions offered are not personalized recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities. At times, issuers of exchange-traded products compensate Pacific Park Financial or its subsidiaries for advertising at the ETF Expert website. ETF Expert content is created independently of any advertising relationships. You may review additional ETF Expert at the site.

Gary Gordon reads:

Real Clear Markets
Jeff Miller
indexuniverse
Charles Kirk
On Twitter, Gary Gordon follows:

Jonathan Hoenig
Doug Kass
Hard Assets Investor

More from ETFs

What Bad Weather? Kohl's Shares Spike as Same-Store Sales Jump

What Bad Weather? Kohl's Shares Spike as Same-Store Sales Jump

Listen: Here's What You Need To Know About ETFs Today (Hint: They're on Fire!)

Listen: Here's What You Need To Know About ETFs Today (Hint: They're on Fire!)

Bitcoin Today: Bears Rear Their Heads as Prices Continue Downward Spiral

Bitcoin Today: Bears Rear Their Heads as Prices Continue Downward Spiral

Cannabis Stocks Are Screaming Sells After Seeing This Deal: Doug Kass Insider

Cannabis Stocks Are Screaming Sells After Seeing This Deal: Doug Kass Insider

60 Seconds: What's the Difference Between an ETF and a Mutual Fund?

60 Seconds: What's the Difference Between an ETF and a Mutual Fund?