Campbell's settled a suit for $1.05 million in September 2011 filled by four women due to claims that a brand of tomato soup was "low sodium." The plaintiffs sued for there being the same amount of sodium as in the regular tomato soup from Campbell's. A class-action lawsuit was also settled for $35 million-plus by Campbell's in 2003 for inflating its sales record.

Numbers like those attract other lawsuits, needless to say.

"There's a boatload of litigation and that is going to continue until companies stop conning people,'' stated Stephen Gardner, litigation director at Center for Science in the Public Interest. Lori Leskin, with Kayle Scholer and co-head of the American Bar Association's Products Liability Committee, noted that, "Companies are tending to pull back from the natural label because it isn't worth it right now.''

What also is "worth it" for plaintiffs attorneys to file lawsuits is the size of the market.

Over $40 billion annually is sold in "natural" foods in the United States. A recent survey by market research firm Mintel found that just over of Americans look for "all natural" when choosing food to buy. That is a huge pool of potential litigants for a class-action lawsuit.

Making it even more alarming is the example of the tobacco industry.

In 1998, the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement was reached between the four largest tobacco companies and the attorney generals of 46 states. Among other conditions, the firms agreed to pay a minimum of $206 billion over the first quarter-century of the agreement for medical and other costs related to smoking.

The lawsuits and the losses still continue for the tobacco industry: In September, a federal arbitration panel ordered the tobacco companies that were party to the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement to pay New York $92 million. Eric Schneiderman, the Attorney General of New York, declared the ruling was, "A huge victory for all New Yorkers, and I applaud the panel for denying Big Tobacco's efforts to avoid responsibility for illnesses caused by cigarettes -- and paid for by taxpayers."

Increases in the size and scope of laws always result in more companies being sued.

That will certainly be the case if food labeling requirements are heightened. At present, there is no shortage of lawsuits being filed for the claims of "natural." That number will rise with greater disclosure requirements for the food sector, potentially rivaling the industry for total costs.

Jonathan Yates does not have a position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article.

This article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.
Jonathan Yates is a financial writer who has had thousands of articles appear in periodicals and Web sites such as TheStreet, Newsweek, The Washington Post and many others. He has degrees from Harvard University, Georgetown University Law Center and The Johns Hopkins University.

If you liked this article you might like

Why Bayer's $66 Billion Takeover of Monsanto Probably Won't Happen Until 2018

Hurricane Maria Has Quickly Become Another Category 5 Storm

Democrats Target Megamergers in Populist Political Play

Bayer, Monsanto Merger Under Scrutiny by EU Commission

Monsanto's Confusing Weed Killer Instructions Drive Farmers to Court