Cracker Barrel, not surprisingly had an adverse reaction to Biglari's proposal, primarily because of the additional debt. As Biglari points out in his letter, though, the board did offer to buy out the Biglari holdings stake twice in the past year, which would have cost the company about $300 million, and would also have increased debt. After one of the offers, Biglari turned the tables, suggesting that instead of buying out Biglari Holdings stake, the $300 million should instead be paid as a $13 special dividend to all shareholders. While Biglari makes an interesting point to the board, stating that if they are willing to go into debt to repurchase Biglari Holding's, they should also be willing to incur debt to return capital to all shareholders. One thing is clear, Biglari is a pain in the backside to Cracker Barrel's management and board, and they just want him to go away. That however, is unlikely, at this point anyway. Cracker Barrel's annual shareholder meeting will be held on Nov. 13, and both the company, and advisory firms such as ISS and Glass Lewis have recommended that shareholders vote against Biglari Holdings director nominees, and a non-binding proposal concerning whether to pay the $20 special dividend. What may be most interesting about this situation is the fact that Cracker Barrel shareholders, besides Biglari Holdings, may see little need for change. After all, the stock is up more than 150% in the past year, and it's difficult for the beneficiaries of to see this as a troubled company. Ironically, Biglari Holdings may be responsible for some of that run-up, as it increased its position. At the time of publication the author is long BH.Follow @JonMHellerCFAThis article is commentary by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.