Why High-Tech Teaching Is a Win for Everyone

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- When Lyndsey Winslett's daughter Ava was home sick last year for six weeks, the fourth-grader didn't miss a single lesson -- her smiling face was right there in class with her friends, pixelated on a computer screen. Thanks to Alabama-based Huntsville City Schools' 1:1 program, which supplies one laptop or tablet for every child in grades 1-12, Ava's teacher was able to dial her student right into the classroom via Skype.

"Every morning her classmates would look into the camera and say, 'Hey, Ava,' 'Good morning, Ava.' It was amazing," Winslett says. "When she finally made it back to school it didn't feel like she had been gone -- there was no tough readjustment or playing catch-up on missed lessons."

Increasingly, programs such as these are becoming more prevalent. Although many public schools in America are still struggling with budget cuts and classroom size, other school systems in Pennsylvania, California, Colorado and elsewhere are making the bold decision to put aside traditional textbooks in favor of laptops and e-readers. The goals? Improving students' grades and saving money for schools and parents.

So far, it's working, says Huntsville City Schools Superintendent Casey Wardynski. Since implementing the program last year, in-school suspension is down by 29%, discipline on buses equipped with Wi-Fi is down by 76% and some schools have seen 12% gains in math and reading skills.

To train teachers properly, keep students' devices in working order and maintain subscriptions to the school's digital curriculum will cost around $420 per student, per year, Wardynski estimates. This comes in slightly lower than the estimated $459 schools stand to save per student, per year by going digital, according to a study by Project Red, a nonprofit that analyzes the financial and student achievement implications of education technology.

"If the Project Red calculation is accurate, we're looking at roughly a $40 difference," Wardynski says. "But we expect it to be cost neutral."

With close to 24,000 students in the system, the savings could amount to as much as $936,000 each year if the Project Red estimate is correct. For now, though, Wardynski says he's more focused on the academic achievement of his students -- although he does admit that the school system is already using a lot less paper and less electricity.

If you liked this article you might like

To Downsize or Not to Downsize: The Retiree's Question

10 Reasons Hiring an Older Worker May be the Best Decision You Ever Make

5 Things Boomer Employees With Millennial Managers Should Never Do

5 Questions to Ask Before You Take the Plunge and Quit Your Day Job

3 Reasons Baby Boomers and Millennials Are More Alike Than Anyone Wants to Admit