Obama on Syria: Yet Another Management Failure

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Russia's ploy to defuse the Syrian crisis -- persuading President Assad to turn over his chemical weapons to avert a U.S. attack -- will likely end in an embarrassment for President Obama and diminish already declining U.S. prestige in the world.

Leading from behind, whether on domestic issues or troubles in the Middle East, Obama fails to accomplish an adequate grasp the challenges or effective solutions. Instead, he defers tough choices to Congress, which is terribly divided.

On health care, European and Japanese rivals spend much less and get more favorable results, making America businesses uncompetitive and destroying jobs. Instead of asking how the U.S. system can do better with less -- something very distasteful to health care providers -- Obama booted the problem to Congress bringing about disastrous results.

Most recently, IBM ( IBM) announced it will force its retirees into Medicare exchanges. Even with subsidies for supplemental insurance, this will result in fewer benefits and higher costs and a broken promise for President Obama. Remember, Americans were supposed to be able to keep the employer insurance they liked.

On Syria, his inability to make tough choices and shoulder responsibility is proving even more tragic.

Last spring, Obama was telling the world Assad has should be held accountable for his violence against civilians and ultimately step down -- yet Obama refused to adequately assist the rebel forces. Stalling gave fundamentalist and terrorist elements from elsewhere in the Middle East time to infiltrate the Syrian insurgency and recruit young men for terrorist activities elsewhere. Deposing Assad now would likely result in a regime even more objectionable and threatening to U.S. interests and cause even more vulnerability to terrorism.

Faced with Assad's horrific use of chemical weapons, Obama concluded a military strike was necessary but refused to embrace his presidential responsibility to act quickly -- on his own authority. Instead, he asked Congress for approval, delayed the debate until the conclusion of the summer recess and gave the political forces in Europe and the United States that always deny the necessity of military action time to organize, and gave leeway to Syrian arms supplier and advocate Russia to work its diplomatic mischief.

The hard reality is that unless U.S. forces are under direct attack, voters will not support action.

President Obama has never accepted that he must take political heat for tough decisions as the price for occupying the Oval Office.

Now Secretary of State Kerry has misstepped. Stating that Syria could wiggle out by delivering its chemical weapons to international authorities, he has permitted Russia, which is most interested in diminishing U.S. status in Europe, to assert it can broker such a deal.

Syria may deliver some weapons, but negotiations over a verification system to ensure the delivery is complete will go on for months and may never conclude. In both Europe and America, opposition to military action will grow and if the president persists in advocating a strike, the U.S. will be increasingly isolated and unable to act effectively without putting its forces at unnecessary risk.

Syria's military assets will be well hidden; its air defenses hardened and the now-positioned Soviet armada will be able to pinpoint American naval movements for its military. Cruise missiles won't be enough and American pilots and seamen will be at great risk.

Had the president acted in August when Assad's use of chemical weapons was determined, he would have had more allied help and American forces would be less vulnerable.

Instead, the president may be forced to back down, leaving Assad in power and to his successor the very difficult task of rebuilding American credibility abroad.

Once again, the president gets an F for his management of the Syrian crisis.
Professor Peter Morici, of the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland, is a recognized expert on economic policy and international economics. Prior to joining the university, he served as director of the Office of Economics at the U.S. International Trade Commission. He is the author of 18 books and monographs and has published widely in leading public policy and business journals, including the Harvard Business Review and Foreign Policy. Morici has lectured and offered executive programs at more than 100 institutions, including Columbia University, the Harvard Business School and Oxford University. His views are frequently featured on CNN, CBS, BBC, FOX, ABC, CNBC, NPR, NPB and national broadcast networks around the world.

If you liked this article you might like

Five-Day Winning Streak in Stocks Expected to Continue

Five-Day Winning Streak in Stocks Expected to Continue

Bitcoin Today: Prices Burst Through $10,000 as Traders Mitigate Stark Warnings

Bitcoin Today: Prices Burst Through $10,000 as Traders Mitigate Stark Warnings

Apple Stock Is Being Bought by Warren Buffett; Should You Buy It?

Apple Stock Is Being Bought by Warren Buffett; Should You Buy It?

Apple Could Get to Zero Net Cash This Way, Says UBS

Apple Could Get to Zero Net Cash This Way, Says UBS

Why You Cannot Rule Out a Much Deeper Stock Market Correction

Why You Cannot Rule Out a Much Deeper Stock Market Correction