Such troubling figures prompted a re-elected President Barack Obama to propose raising the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour. If enacted, such a measure would boost the wages of an estimated 15 million low-income workers and make it the highest the federal minimum wage has been in more than three decades, adjusting for inflation. "Even with the tax relief we've put in place, a family with two kids that earns the minimum wage still lives below the poverty line. That's wrong," Obama said in his State of the Union address in January. "Let's declare that in the wealthiest nation on earth, no one who works full time should have to live in poverty." To others, $9 still falls short. Last March, Democrats U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin of Iowa and U.S. Rep. George Miller of California introduced legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage to $10.10 an hour. This is more in line with the position of the National Employment Law Project, which supports a federal minimum wage increase to $10.55 per hour, a rate much closer to what it would be if the wage were adjusted to keep up with inflation over the past 40 years. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/06/speedup-americans-working-harder-charts Even a full time job that pays $10 an hour is still highly unlikely to offer a single adult economic security, though. The report The Basic Economic Security Tables for the United States, released by the nonprofit group Wider Opportunities for Women back in 2011, found that a single worker needs an income of $30,012 a year, or slightly above $14 an hour, to achieve basic economic security. By comparison, a person working a job at the current federal minimum wage gets only an annual salary of $15,080, assuming it is a full-time position.
Despite these compelling figures, there are still many who object to a $15 hourly wage for fast food service workers. ''There's no room in the fast-food business model for substantially higher pay levels without raising prices for food,'' Richard Adams, former McDonald's franchise owner and fast-food consulting business owner, told The Boston Globe last month. This may not be true, though. According to the private-company financial-data analytics fir, Sageworks, revenues at fast food firms have increased more than 20% in the past two years while the percentage of revenue spent on payroll has decreased nearly a quarter. Such figures suggest that private fast-food industries could distribute their profits more evenly among lower-wage workers without a significant impact to their bottom lines. Additionally, while it has been argued that a fast-food service worker can hypothetically work his or her way up the latter, NELP found that only 2.2% of positions in the fast food industry are "managerial" or "corporate" and that those in managerial positions earn a median wage of only $8.94 per hour. Considering this, it may be hard to convince strikers that fast food industries are being earnest when they tout opportunities for advancement, such as when Fortune 500 company McDonald's, which achieved $34 billion in sales last year, stated on its website that it "aims to offer competitive pay and benefits to our employees." "Regardless of how profitable McDonald's is or isn't, it's clear that in the aggregate, many businesses could afford to pay their workers more," wrote Christopher Matthews for Time. "Can you really blame fast-food workers for realizing this fact and trying to force their bosses to share some of corporate America's good fortune?"