5 Years Later, Mortgage Market Still Needs Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac (Update 1)

Updated from 7:00 a.m. ET with comments from fund manager Bruce Berkowitz.

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Five years ago this week, the government bailed out housing finance giants Fannie Mae ( FNMA) and Freddie Mac ( FMCC) and placed them in conservatorship.

It was the first of many bailouts to follow, but it was the largest, with taxpayer support adding up to $188 billion over time.

Today, these government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs, are back to making record profits, thanks in part to a recovery in housing. By September, Fannie and Freddie will have collectively paid Treasury $146 billion in dividends. Analysts predict the dividends from GSE could make taxpayers whole by the end of 2014.

Shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are rising from the dead, up 384% and 329% respectively year-to-date.

The GSEs also remain the biggest providers of liquidity in the mortgage market. Together with the Federal Housing Administration, they back nine out of every 10 new mortgages originated today, with private capital largely missing from the market.

Still, there is no talk of the companies returning to private hands, much to the chagrin of shareholders who have held onto the shares. In fact, practically everyone in Washington wants them dead.

'Guaranteed to Fail'

That's because the fall of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was not merely a story of reckless risk-taking and corporate excess. It was also deemed a failure of a system of mortgage finance that the government promoted for decades.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were private companies that were chartered by the government. That meant that while they pursued maximum shareholder profits like any other private company, they also served a public mission -- to provide liquidity to the mortgage market and keep mortgage loans affordable.

The GSEs did not directly lend to borrowers. Rather they bought mortgage loans from banks, thereby leaving lenders with the liquidity to make more loans. They made it possible for a product like the 30-year fixed rate mortgage to become widely available at low interest rates because they absorbed the risks of borrower default, as well as the risk that market rates could rise over the repayment period.

The GSEs held the mortgage loans on their balance sheets but also routinely packaged loans into securities and sold them to investors. They continued to guarantee payment of principal and interest on the loans backing those securities, while investors shouldered the interest rate risk.

Wall Street Meltdown: Five Years Later:

If you liked this article you might like

Mortgage Payments Could Be Hurt by Harvey's Impact on Houston

Fannie Mae: 36,583 Homes it Covers are in Harvey's Path

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Would Be Privatized Under Proposed House Budget

RBS Agrees to $5.5 Billion Fine in Pre-Crisis Mortgage Probe