NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Although Clean Harbors (CLH - Get Report) has not benefited from world conflict, I do recall Alan McKim, the company's CEO, describing the 2010 BP (BP - Get Report) oil spill by saying, "It's like a war zone." In many respects, this was an accurate depiction. While the initial rig explosion, which caused the spill, resulted in (only) 11 reported deaths, let's not forget that 8,000 animals lost their lives as more than 200 million gallons of crude oil made its way across 16,000 total miles.No doubt this was an unfortunate disaster for (among others) the residents of Louisiana and Mississippi. It was, on the other hand, a great opportunity for Clean Harbors, which was contracted to contain the massive spill from spreading through the Gulf of Mexico. Investors wasted no time speculating that "BP's trash" would be Clean Harbors' treasure. They guessed correctly. In fact, in the two months after the April 20, 2010, spill, shares of Clean Harbors soared more than 30%. Fast-forward two years later, Hurricane Sandy, a category 3 storm at its peak, emerged. Here too, the term "war zone" seems appropriate to describe the destructive aftermath, which left 286 people dead, while causing close to $70 billion in damages to the entire Eastern seaboard. The storm was so severe that it actually shut down the stock market. But Clean Harbors was open for business. As with the BP spill, Sandy was an unfortunate disaster that couldn't have come at a better time for the Clean Harbors, which "cleaned up" pretty well both in its actually cleanup efforts and in the stock market. TheStreet's Jim Cramer, on his popular CNBC show "Mad Money", correctly predicted Clean Harbors' exploitable advantage. Because of Sandy, the stock went on to gain 27% in a span of six trading days as Sandy's brutal impact began to emerge out of New Jersey and New York.
I want to clear something up, though. While I have cited these two examples of how Clean Harbors has benefited from horrific events, I don't want to paint the company as some blood-hungry hound that seeks to profit off the hardships of others. Neither Sandy nor BP's oil spill was the fault of Clean Harbors. I want to be careful in making this known. And I don't believe that anyone associated with Clean Harbors is happy about any personal damage that the company has been called upon to clean. However, as they say, "It's a tough job, but somebody's got to do it." And as with rivals like Waste Management ( WM - Get Report) and Veolia Environnement ( VE), much of Clean Harbors' revenue is predicated on cleaning up other people's messes. Unfortunately, though, there hasn't been another mess to clean up since Sandy. And investors have become "lukewarm" about Clean Harbors' stock. Although shares have posted gains of 4% on the year to date, the stock is down close to 6% over the past four months. By contrast, during that same span, shares of Waste Management are up close to 30%, while Veolia stock is up 20%. I believe the reason for the "indifference" in the stock has much to do with Clean Harbors' $1.25 all-cash deal to buy rival Safety-Kleen, which was announced (interestingly) when the markets closed due to Sandy's destruction in New York. I'm not suggesting that investors are angry at the deal. But it seems the Street is waiting to see what sort of value comes out of this union. On Wednesday, the company will report second quarter results, which should shed more light on the company's direction, while giving investors a fresh glimpse on what Clean Harbors can truly become. I like the company's prospect a lot better with Safety-Kleen than I did prior to the deal. But it's going to take some time for management to "clean up" the synergistic advantages and reduce the overlap created by the acquisition. In the meantime, given that Clean Harbors is already trades at a price-to-earnings ratio of 29, which is more than twice that of Veolia and 6 points higher than Waste Management, I wouldn't rush to jump into the stock here. This is unless of course a disaster breaks. At the time of publication, the author held no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Follow @saintssense This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.