Moto X: And the Price Wasn't Even Right

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Everything I said in my recent article about my expectations forMotorola X came true, except it was one step worse.

I said the devicewill be mediocre compared to the best Androids that Samsung and othershave to offer, but that the situation could be saved by a killerprice -- just as what Google ( GOOG) does with the SIM-unlocked,contract-free, LG Nexus 4.

But in the end, it turns out it wasn't even cheaper.

And there is no new interesting sales model.

Motorola brings the Moto X to market with the same tired and expensiveoperator contract model that has been plaguing the U.S. smartphonemarket for over a decade. With the exception of T-Mobile ( TMUS), the otheroperators bind you for two years and charge you the equivalent of apayday loan for the privilege of carrying their SIM-locked brick untila year after its warranty has expired.

There is, as yet, no unlocked, no-contract price for the Moto X. Inthe meantime, the overpriced prison-style contract pricing is $200 forthe 16-gig version, and $250 for the 32-gig version.

Hey, at least Motorola exposes Apple's ( AAPL) insanely greedy memory pricingby charging you only $50 for the jump from 16 gig to 32 gig. Applecharges you $100 for the identical upgrade. This tells you Apple ison the verge of a margin collapse: Competition, it hurts.

Depending on the operator and the channel, you can get a class-leadingSamsung Galaxy S4 or HTC One for $100 or $200 on a two-year contract.In comparison to those, the Moto X offers you a one-year-old CPU and720p screen resolution instead of 1080p resolution. Well, thank youfor selling me a device with one-year-old specs at the same or doublethe upfront price!

Android 4.3: What's that?

If the hardware is a year old, surely because Google owns Motorola atleast you get the very latest in software, no?

Uh, no.

Over the last week, I got Android 4.3 on my almost two-year-oldSamsung Galaxy Nexus, and on my one-year-old Asus Nexus 7. Surely,the Moto X, being the very newest device made by Google's ownsubsidiary, launches with the latest Android software?

The Motorola X launches with Android 4.2.2, which Samsung offered back in April on its current flagship device, the Galaxy S4.Any promise to upgrade it to Android 4.3 by a certain timeframe, orat all for that matter? Not that I can find anywhere on Motorola'sWeb site.

This is particularly painful because of the meaningful improvements wehave seen in the devices that have been upgraded from Android 4.2.2 to4.3. Did they do this just to show that Motorola gets deliberatesecond-class treatment by Google? Or was Motorola tooslow/incompetent to implement what Samsung, LG and Asus are already offering?

Had Google wanted to take the Motorola opportunity to shake up thewireless industry, it would have circumvented all the traditionaloperator channels and offered the Moto X strictly from its own Website and other independent distributors for $299 or $349, just likethe LG Nexus 4. It would have told consumers to pick up apay-as-you-go SIM card from T-Mobile or Wal-Mart ( WMT) for $30 per device, or $100 for four lines.

Speaking of the LG Nexus 4, the Moto X actually has almost identicalspecs: Similar Qualcomm ( QCOM) Snapdragon CPU, similar 4.7-inch 720p screen,no removable battery or expandable storage.

The LG Nexus 4 came out last October, so perhaps LG should sueMotorola for some sort of infringement? Well, that would be ambitiousgiven that the year-old Nexus 4 already offers Android 4.3 whereas theMoto X isn't yet in stores but will launch on Android 4.2.2. The MotoX is no threat to the LG Nexus 4.

Sarcasm aside, it does remain true that the Moto X isa perfectly fine mainstream Android, slightly above the mid-range inthe marketplace. There is nothing wrong with it -- that the rightprice couldn't have cured.

It's easy to have sympathy for Google's dilemma here. On the onehand, it would be great if Motorola could be the dominant king ofsmartphones.

The problem is that it isn't. It's badly behind the other companies,most notably Samsung.

Therein resides Google's dilemma: It's got bigger fish to frythan prodding Motorola to excellence. Google's main priority rightnow -- after managing a 2014-2015 transition from Android to Chrome OS(Chromephone) -- is to ensure that Samsung doesn't wander off thereservation.

Google's relationship to Motorola is like Michael Corleone'srelationship to his brother Fredo: You're stuck with him -- for now,anyway -- but you can't allow him to play an important role. So youmake him into a nightclub promoter, giving him some money to spend.Hence the rumored fat marketing budget for the overpriced Moto X.

If Samsung got the slightest whiff that Google was giving specialprivilege to Motorola, it could trigger Samsung going on an all-outwar against Google. That's something Google needs asmuch as another antitrust lawsuit, which is to say it needs to beavoided at all cost.

Make no mistake about it: Google is keeping Samsung fully briefedabout what is going to happen with Motorola. Google can't afford Samsung feeling betrayed, which would result in a possible collapse ofthe Android ecosystem as we know it. Motorola is but a pawn in this shadow-boxing game, sort of like a Switzerland's role in WorldWar 2 and the Cold War alike.

Or like Fredo Corleone.

Google's relationship with Samsung had started to crack in the yearleading up to March 2013. By April, Google's leadership traveledto South Korea and something happened -- suddenly Google and Samsung were best friends.

Surely there were many pieces to such a peace deal, butassuring Samsung that Motorola wouldn't be used to hurt it materially was likely one component of this peace treaty.

Motorola is a decent device that's not priced to sell. That's by design.

At the time of publication the author was long GOOG, AAPL and QCOM.

This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.

More from Technology

These 5 Tech Giants Still Aren't That Expensive

These 5 Tech Giants Still Aren't That Expensive

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich's Ouster Proves CEOs Aren't Above the Rules

Intel CEO Brian Krzanich's Ouster Proves CEOs Aren't Above the Rules

Amazon, Microsoft and Google Face Backlash over ICE, Military Deals

Amazon, Microsoft and Google Face Backlash over ICE, Military Deals

As Intel Loses Its CEO, How Well Can It Compete Against Nvidia?

As Intel Loses Its CEO, How Well Can It Compete Against Nvidia?

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In

3 Great Stock Market Sectors Millennials Should Invest In