Dell Special Committee Responds To Revised Proposal From Michael Dell And Silver Lake

The Special Committee of the Board of Dell Inc. (NASDAQ: DELL) sent the following letter to Michael Dell and Silver Lake Partners in response to their revised acquisition proposal of July 23, 2013 :

July 30, 2013

Mr. Michael S. DellDell Inc.One Dell WayRound Rock, Texas 78682

Mr. Egon DurbanSilver Lake Partners9 West 57th Street, 32 nd floorNew York, NY 10019

Dear Mr. Dell and Mr. Durban:

The Special Committee has carefully reviewed your letter of July 23, 2013, in which you propose to increase your offer to $13.75 from $13.65 per share subject to the Committee agreeing to change the voting standard such that non-voting shares are no longer the functional equivalent of no votes in determining the majority of disinterested shares.

The Committee is not prepared to accept your proposal. We are, however, willing to establish a new record date for a vote on a $13.75 per share transaction under the existing voting standard. A new record date would enable the many shareholders who bought their shares after June 3, 2013 to vote on the transaction while giving all shareholders more time to reflect on where their best interests lie in light of the improved offer.

In the alternative, we are prepared to proceed with a vote on the existing $13.65 per share transaction at the Special Meeting to be reconvened on August 2, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. Central Time.

We look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

THE SPECIAL COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DELL INC.

By _______/s/________

Alex J. Mandl

Forward-looking Statements

Any statements in these materials about prospective performance and plans for the Company, the expected timing of the completion of the proposed merger and the ability to complete the proposed merger, and other statements containing the words “estimates,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects,” “will,” and similar expressions, other than historical facts, constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Factors or risks that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results we anticipate include, but are not limited to: (1) the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement; (2) the inability to complete the proposed merger due to the failure to obtain stockholder approval for the proposed merger or the failure to satisfy other conditions to completion of the proposed merger, including that a governmental entity may prohibit, delay or refuse to grant approval for the consummation of the transaction; (3) the failure to obtain the necessary financing arrangements set forth in the debt and equity commitment letters delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; (4) risks related to disruption of management’s attention from the Company’s ongoing business operations due to the transaction; and (5) the effect of the announcement of the proposed merger on the Company’s relationships with its customers, operating results and business generally.

If you liked this article you might like

10 States Where the Wealthiest Executives Call Home

DiCaprio, De Niro Headline List of Major Celebrities Hosting Hurricane Telethon

Lenovo Posts Surprise Loss as Chip Shortages Squeeze Margins

Dell Takes On Cloud Leaders With New Payment Model

How to Play a U.S. Trade War With China