Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (NASDAQ: HBAN; www.huntington.com) reported 2013 second quarter net income of $150.7 million, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 1%, from the 2012 second quarter and a decrease of $1.1 million, or 1%, from the 2013 first quarter. Earnings per common share were $0.17, unchanged from the prior and year ago quarters. The board of directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on its common stock of $0.05 per common share. The dividend is payable October 1, 2013, to shareholders of record on September 17, 2013. Strategies Continue to Drive Business Performance "Huntington had a good quarter that demonstrates progress in our strategic priorities," said Stephen D. Steinour, chairman, president and CEO of Huntington Bank. “I am extremely pleased that we have returned to pre-recession, normal credit levels ahead of our prior expectations. This reflects our disciplined and prudent lending approach. We also continue to experience double-digit household growth. Expenses were managed slightly below our expectations. Revenue was relatively unchanged as strategic growth overcame multiple environmental headwinds and the prior quarters’ Low Income Housing Tax Credit related gains. Consumer lending and deposits have increased over the same quarter last year as consumer confidence in the recovery rises. Our commercial pipeline continues to be strong as business owners are seeing more signs of economic growth. Employment across our Midwest markets continues to improve with Ohio creating the largest month-to-month employment increase in the nation in May and Michigan coming in third." "We remain on track to deliver sustainable levels of long-term profitability," added Steinour. "Our estimate for the negative impact from Basel III is approximately 90 basis points better than last year’s estimate. Our existing strategic investments continue to mature. We are focused on expense management and a more robust continuous improvement effort across the enterprise.”
Table 1 – Earnings Performance Summary
|($ in millions, except per share data)||SecondQuarter||FirstQuarter||FourthQuarter||ThirdQuarter||SecondQuarter|
|Diluted earnings per common share||0.17||0.17||0.19||0.19||0.17|
|Return on average assets||1.08||%||1.10||%||1.19||%||1.19||%||1.10||%|
|Return on average common equity||10.4||10.7||11.6||11.9||11.1|
|Return on average tangible common equity||12.0||12.4||13.5||13.9||13.1|
|Net interest margin||3.38||3.42||3.45||3.38||3.42|
|Tangible book value per common share||$||5.88||$||5.91||$||5.78||$||5.71||$||5.49|
|Cash dividends declared per common share||0.05||0.04||0.04||0.04||0.04|
|Average diluted shares outstanding (000's)||843,840||848,708||853,306||863,588||867,551|
|Average earning assets||$||51,156||$||50,960||$||50,682||$||51,330||$||51,050|
|Average core deposits||43,768||43,616||44,310||43,764||42,781|
|Tangible common equity / tangible assets ratio||8.78||%||8.92||%||8.76||%||8.74||%||8.41||%|
|Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio||10.71||10.62||10.48||10.28||10.08|
|NCOs as a % of average loans and leases||0.34||%||0.51||%||0.69||%||1.05||%||0.82||%|
|ACL as a % of total loans and leases||1.86||1.91||1.99||2.09||2.28|
Table 2 – Significant Items Influencing Earnings Performance Comparisons
|Three Months Ended||Impact|
|(in millions, except per share)||Amount (1)||EPS (2)|
|June 30, 2013 – net income||$150.7||$0.17|
|March 31, 2013 – net income||$151.8||$0.17|
|December 31, 2012 – net income||$167.3||$0.19|
|September 30, 2012 – net income||$167.8||$0.19|
|• State deferred tax valuation allowance benefit||19.5||0.02|
|June 30, 2012 – net income||$152.7||$0.17|
|($ in millions)||Quarter||Quarter||Quarter||Quarter||Quarter||LQ||YOY|
|Net interest income||$||424.9||$||424.2||$||434.1||$||430.3||$||429.0||0||%||(1||)||%|
|Net interest income - FTE||431.5||430.1||439.5||435.6||434.7||0||(1||)|
|Total revenue - FTE||$||680.2||$||682.3||$||737.2||$||696.6||$||688.5||(0||)||%||(1||)||%|
|Yield / Cost||LQ||YOY|
|Total earning assets||3.68||%||3.75||%||3.80||%||3.79||%||3.89||%||(7||)||(21||)|
|Total loans and leases||3.95||4.03||4.13||4.12||4.18||(9||)||(24||)|
|Total interest-bearing liabilities||0.42||0.45||0.50||0.58||0.63||(4||)||(22||)|
|Total interest-bearing deposits||0.36||0.38||0.42||0.48||0.51||(3||)||(16||)|
|Net interest rate spread||3.26||3.30||3.30||3.21||3.26||(4||)||0|
|Impact of noninterest-bearing funds on margin||0.12||0.12||0.15||0.17||0.16||0||(4||)|
|Net interest margin||3.38||%||3.42||%||3.45||%||3.38||%||3.42||%||(4||)||(4||)|
- 21 basis point negative impact from the mix and yield of earning assets primarily reflecting a decrease in consumer loan yields.
- 16 basis point positive impact from the mix and yield of deposits reflecting the strategic focus on changing the funding sources to no-cost demand deposits and low cost money markets deposits.
Table 4 – Average Earning Assets – C&I and Automobile Continue To Drive Growth
|Average Loans and Leases|
|Commercial and industrial||$||17.0||$||17.0||$||16.5||$||16.3||$||16.1||0||%||6||%|
|Commercial real estate||5.0||5.3||5.5||5.7||6.1||(5||)||(17||)|
|Total loans and leases||41.3||40.9||40.4||40.1||41.2||1||0|
|Held-for-sale and other earning assets||0.8||0.8||0.9||1.9||0.5||(2||)||43|
|Total earning assets||$||51.2||$||51.0||$||50.7||$||51.3||$||51.1||0||%||0||%|
- $0.9 billion, or 6%, growth in average Commercial and Industrial (C&I) loans. This reflected the continued growth across most business lines, with particularly strong growth in the healthcare vertical, dealer floorplan, and equipment finance.
- $0.3 billion, or 6%, increase in average Automobile loans. In addition, $0.3 billion of automobile loans were transferred from loans held for sale to automobile loans and leases on June 30, as there are no securitizations expected for the remainder of 2013. This transfer had a minimal impact on average balances.
- $1.1 billion, or 17%, decrease in average Commercial Real Estate (CRE) loans. This reflected continued runoff of the noncore portfolio and managed reduction of the core portfolios as acceptable returns for new core originations were balanced against internal concentration limits and increased competition for projects sponsored by high quality developers.
Table 5 – Average Liabilities – Core Deposit Growth Offsets Reduction in Borrowings
|Demand deposits - noninterest bearing||$||12.9||$||12.2||$||13.1||$||12.3||$||12.1||6||%||7||%|
|Demand deposits - interest bearing||5.9||6.0||5.8||5.8||5.9||(1||)||(0||)|
|Total demand deposits||18.8||18.1||19.0||18.1||18.0||4||4|
|Money market deposits||15.1||15.0||14.7||14.5||13.2||0||14|
|Savings and other domestic deposits||5.1||5.1||5.0||5.0||5.0||1||3|
|Core certificates of deposit||4.8||5.3||5.6||6.1||6.6||(11||)||(28||)|
|Total core deposits||43.8||43.6||44.3||43.8||42.8||0||2|
|Other domestic deposits of $250,000 or more||0.3||0.4||0.4||0.3||0.3||(10||)||9|
|Brokered deposits and negotiable CDs||1.8||1.7||1.8||1.9||1.4||5||25|
|Short and long-term borrowings||2.8||2.8||2.4||3.1||4.3||(2||)||(36||)|
|Total Interest-bearing liabilities||$||36.1||$||36.6||$||36.1||$||37.0||$||37.1||(2||)||%||(3||)||%|
- $1.5 billion, or 36%, decrease in subordinated notes and other short- and long-term debt reflecting the repayment of $0.6 billion of TLGP related debt in June of 2012 and the redemption of $0.2 billion of trust preferred securities in 2012 second half.
- $1.8 billion, or 28%, decrease in average core certificates of deposit due to the strategic focus on changing the funding sources to no-cost demand deposits and low cost money markets deposits.
- $1.9 billion, or 14%, increase in money market deposits reflecting the strategic focus on increased share of wallet and customer preference for increased liquidity.
Noninterest IncomeTable 6 – Noninterest Income – Service Charges and Electronic Banking Mostly Offset Lack of LIHTC Sale and Decline in MSR Hedge
|Service charges on deposit accounts||$||68.0||$||60.9||$||68.1||$||67.8||$||66.0||12||%||3||%|
|Mortgage banking income||33.7||45.2||61.7||44.6||38.3||(26||)||(12||)|
|Gain on sale of loans||3.3||2.6||20.7||6.6||4.1||28||(19||)|
|Bank owned life insurance income||15.4||13.4||13.8||14.4||14.0||15||10|
|Capital markets fees||12.2||7.8||12.7||11.6||13.3||56||(8||)|
|Securities (losses) gains||(0.4||)||(0.5||)||0.9||4.2||0.4||(19||)||(217||)|
|Total noninterest income||$||248.7||$||252.2||$||297.7||$||261.1||$||253.8||(1||)||%||(2||)||%|
- $5.3 million, or 17%, decrease in other noninterest income including a $4.3 million reduction in the gain on the sale of LIHTC investments.
- $4.7 million, or 12%, decrease in mortgage banking income as the benefit of net mortgage servicing rights (MSR) decreased by $2.5 million while origination and secondary marketing income declined $2.3 million primarily due to lower spreads.
Compared to the 2013 first quarter, the $3.6 million, or 1%, decrease in noninterest income reflected the $11.6 million, or 26%, decrease in mortgage banking income as the benefit of net mortgage servicing rights (MSR) decreased by $11.6 million. Other income decreased $7.9 million, or 24%, as the prior quarter included a $7.6 million gain on the sale of LIHTC investments. These were partially offset by a $7.1 million, or 12%, increase in service charges on deposit accounts that follow yearly seasonal trends in customer activity and 8% annualized growth in consumer checking households, and a $4.4 million, or 56%, increase in capital markets activity.Noninterest Expense Table 7 – Noninterest Expense – Essentially Flat as Pace of Investment Slows
|Outside data processing and other services||49.9||49.3||48.7||50.4||48.6||1||3|
|Deposit and other insurance expense||13.5||15.5||16.3||15.5||15.7||(13||)||(14||)|
|Amortization of intangibles||10.4||10.3||11.6||11.4||11.9||0||(13||)|
|OREO and foreclosure expense||(0.3||)||2.7||4.2||5.0||4.1||(110||)||(107||)|
|Gain on early extinguishment of debt||-||-||-||1.8||(2.6||)||NR||(100||)|
|Total noninterest expense||$||445.9||$||442.8||$||470.6||$||458.3||$||444.3||1||%||0||%|
|Number of employees (full-time equivalent)||12.2||12.1||11.8||11.7||11.4||1||%||6||%|
- $20.8 million, or 9%, increase in personnel costs, reflecting a increased salaries and benefits and a 6% increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees, primarily reflecting growth in the in-store initiative and mortgage business.
- $8.3 million, or 20%, decline in other expense, reflecting lower representations and warranties related expenses and lower litigation expense.
- $5.7 million, or 38%, decrease in professional services, reflecting a decrease in legal and outside consultant expenses.
- $4.4 million decline in OREO and foreclosure expense as there were net gains of $0.3 million during the 2013 second quarter.
- $3.2 million, or 18%, decrease in marketing, primarily reflecting the refinement of targeted marketing programs and reduced promotional offers.
Credit QualityTable 8 – Summary Credit Quality Metrics – Continued Improvement
|($ in thousands)||Jun. 30||Mar. 31||Dec. 31||Sep. 30||Jun. 30|
|Total nonaccrual loans and leases||$||363,546||$||380,311||$||407,633||$||445,046||$||474,166|
|Total other real estate, net||21,066||25,139||28,097||54,206||38,608|
|Other NPAs (1)||12,087||10,045||10,045||10,476||10,476|
|Total nonperforming assets(2)||$||396,699||$||415,495||$||445,775||$||509,728||$||523,250|
|Accruing loans and leases past due 90 days or more||94,123||108,423||110,316||108,219||95,555|
|NPAs + accruing loans and lease past due 90 days or more||$||490,822||$||523,918||$||556,091||$||617,947||$||618,805|
|NAL ratio (2)||0.87||%||0.92||%||1.00||%||1.11||%||1.19||%|
|NPA ratio (3)||0.95||1.01||1.09||1.26||1.31|
|Provision for credit losses||$||24,722||$||29,592||$||39,458||$||37,004||$||36,520|
|Net charge-offs / Average total loans||0.34||%||0.51||%||0.69||%||1.05||%||0.82||%|
|Allowance for loans and lease losses||$||733,076||$||746,769||$||769,075||$||789,142||$||859,646|
|Allowance for unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit||44,223||40,855||40,651||53,563||50,978|
|Allowance for credit losses (ACL)||$||777,299||$||787,624||$||809,726||$||842,705||$||910,624|
|ACL as a % of:|
|Total loans and leases||1.86||%||1.91||%||1.99||%||2.09||%||2.28||%|
|(1) Other nonperforming assets includes certain impaired investment securities.|
|(2) NPA’s related to Chapter 7 bankruptcy: 2Q13- $59.6 MM, 1Q13- $59.9 MM, 4Q12 - $60.1 MM, and 3Q12 - $63.0 MM|
|(3) Total NALs as a % of total loans and leases|
|(4) Total NPAs as a % of sum of loans and leases, impaired loans held for sale, and net other real estate.|
The provision for credit losses decreased $11.8 million, or 32%, from the 2012 second quarter. Net charge-offs (NCOs) benefited from higher levels of recoveries than experienced over the last year and were $34.8 million, down 59% from $84.2 million in the year-ago quarter. NCOs were an annualized 0.34% of average loans and leases in the current quarter, down from 0.82% in the 2012 second quarter. The period-end allowance for credit losses (ACL) as a percentage of total loans and leases decreased to 1.86% from 2.28% a year ago, while the ACL as a percentage of period-end total NALs increased to 214% from 192%.Capital Table 9 – Capital Ratios – Tier 1 Common Continues to Increase
|(in millions)||Jun. 30||Mar. 31||Dec. 31||Sep. 30||Jun. 30|
|Tangible common equity / tangible assets ratio||8.78||%||8.92||%||8.76||%||8.74||%||8.41||%|
|Tier 1 common risk-based capital ratio||10.71||%||10.62||%||10.48||%||10.28||%||10.08||%|
|Regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio||12.24||%||12.16||%||12.02||%||11.88||%||11.93||%|
|Excess over 6.0% (1)||$||3,000||$||2,953||$||2,876||$||2,831||$||2,840|
|Regulatory Total risk-based capital ratio||14.57||%||14.55||%||14.50||%||14.37||%||14.42||%|
|Excess over 10.0% (1)||$||2,197||$||2,181||$||2,150||$||2,104||$||2,117|
|Total risk-weighted assets||$||48,077||$||47,937||$||47,773||$||48,147||$||47,890|
The regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio at June 30, 2013 was 12.24%, up from 11.93% at June 30, 2012. The increase in the regulatory Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio reflected the increase in retained earnings, partially offset by redemption of $150 million of qualifying trust preferred securities since June 30, 2012. All capital ratios were impacted by the repurchase of 31.6 million common shares over the last four quarters, of which 10.0 million were repurchased in the 2013 second quarter at an average price per share of $7.50.Income Taxes The provision for income taxes in the 2013 second quarter was $52.4 million, $52.2 million in the 2013 first quarter, and $49.3 million in the 2012 second quarter. The effective tax rates for the 2013 second quarter, 2013 first quarter, and 2012 second quarter were 25.8%, 25.6%, and 24.4%, respectively. At June 30, 2013, the net federal deferred tax asset was $159.0 million and the net state deferred tax asset was $39.7 million. Based on both positive and negative evidence and the level of forecasted future taxable income, there was no impairment to the net federal and net state deferred tax assets at June 30, 2013. As of June 30, 2013 and March 31, 2013, there was no disallowed deferred tax asset for regulatory capital purposes. 2013 Expectations "Huntington is seeing an uptick in manufacturing across our markets led by the auto industry along with continued investments in the fledgling oil and gas exploration industry,” said Steinour. "We believe these developments, along with recent upward revisions to economic growth forecasts in 2014, will trigger further business investment. We also are seeing a stronger than expected housing recovery across much of our region, which we believe will lead to more consumer spending. We will remain disciplined as we manage our returns on an aggregate moderate-to-low risk profile."
Net interest income is expected to modestly grow over the remainder of 2013. We anticipate an increase in total loans will be partially offset by a reduction in total securities as the portfolio’s cash flow is not reinvested into additional securities. However, those benefits to net interest income are expected to be mostly offset by continued downward NIM pressure. 2013 NIM is not expected to fall below the mid 3.30%’s due to continued deposit repricing and mix shift opportunities while maintaining a disciplined approach to loan pricing.The C&I portfolio is expected to see growth consistent with the anticipated increase in customer activity. Our C&I loan pipeline remains robust with much of this reflecting the positive impact from our investments in specialized commercial verticals, focused OCR sales process, and continued support of middle market and small business lending. Given automobile loan yields are relatively more attractive than similar duration securities and the recent decline in estimated securitization gains, we currently do not anticipate any automobile securitizations in the second half of 2013. Residential mortgages and home equity loan balances are expected to increase modestly. CRE loans are expected to remain in the current $5 billion range. We anticipate the increase in total loans will outpace growth in total deposits. This reflects our continued focus on the overall cost of funds as well as the continued shift towards low- and no-cost demand deposits and money market deposit accounts. Yesterday, the board of directors approved and management communicated a curtailment of the Company’s pension plan effective December 31, 2013. As a result of the accounting treatment for the unamortized prior service pension cost and the change in the projected benefit obligation, a one-time non-cash gain is expected to be recognized in the 2013 third quarter. Noninterest income, when compared to 2012 levels, is expected to be flat to slightly down, excluding the impact of any automobile loan sales, any net MSR impact, and the aforementioned one-time gain. The anticipated slowdown in mortgage banking activity is expected to be mostly offset by continued growth in new customers, increased contribution from higher cross-sell, and the continued maturation of our previous strategic investments.
Third quarter expenses are expected to modestly increase due to higher commission expense and higher occupancy and equipment expense related to our continued in-store expansion. Expenses will be consistent with previous expectations, with a modest downward bias related to the pension related expense. We continue to evaluate additional cost saving opportunities. We remain committed to posting positive operating leverage in 2013.NPAs are expected to experience continued improvement. This quarter, NCOs were slightly below our expected normalized range of 35 to 55 basis points. The level of provision for credit losses was below our long-term expectation, and we continue to expect moderate quarterly volatility. The effective tax rate for 2013 is expected to be in the range of 25% to 28%, primarily reflecting the impacts of tax-exempt income, tax advantaged investments, and general business credits. Conference Call / Webcast Information Huntington’s senior management will host an earnings conference call on Thursday, July 18, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Time). The call may be accessed via a live Internet webcast at www.huntington-ir.com or through a dial-in telephone number at (877) 684-3807; Conference ID 96993401. Slides will be available at www.huntington-ir.com about an hour prior to the call. A replay of the webcast will be archived in the Investor Relations section of Huntington’s web site, www.huntington.com. A telephone replay will be available approximately two hours after the completion of the call through July 31, 2013 at (855) 859-2056 or (404) 537-3406; conference ID #96993401. Please see the 2013 Second Quarter Quarterly Financial Supplement for additional detailed financial performance metrics. This document can be found at: http://www.investquest.com/iq/h/hban/ne/news/index.htm Forward-looking Statement This document contains certain forward-looking statements, including certain plans, expectations, goals, projections, and statements, which are subject to numerous assumptions, risks, and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as expect, anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, plan, target, goal, or similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as will, may, might, should, would, could, or similar variations. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained or implied in the forward-looking statements: (1) worsening of credit quality performance due to a number of factors such as the underlying value of collateral that could prove less valuable than otherwise assumed and assumed cash flows may be worse than expected; (2) changes in economic conditions, including impacts from the implementation of the Budget Control Act of 2011, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2013, as well as the continuing economic uncertainty in the US, the European Union, and other areas; (3) movements in interest rates; (4) competitive pressures on product pricing and services; (5) success, impact, and timing of our business strategies, including market acceptance of any new products or services implementing our “Fair Play” banking philosophy; (6) changes in accounting policies and principles and the accuracy of our assumptions and estimates used to prepare our financial statements; (7) extended disruption of vital infrastructure; (8) the final outcome of significant litigation; (9) the nature, extent, timing, and results of governmental actions, examinations, reviews, reforms, regulations, and interpretations, including those related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, as well as those involving the OCC, Federal Reserve, and CFPB;and (10) the outcome of judicial and regulatory decisions regarding practices in the residential mortgage industry, including among other things the processes followed for foreclosing residential mortgages. Additional factors that could cause results to differ materially from those described above can be found in Huntington’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and documents subsequently filed by Huntington with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available at the time of the release. Huntington assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
Basis of PresentationUse of Non-GAAP Financial Measures This document may contain GAAP financial measures and non-GAAP financial measures where management believes it to be helpful in understanding Huntington’s results of operations or financial position. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the comparable GAAP financial measure, as well as the reconciliation to the comparable GAAP financial measure, can be found in this fourth quarter earnings conference call slides, or the Form 8-K related to this document, all of which can be found on Huntington’s website at www.huntington-ir.com. Significant Items From time to time, revenue, expenses, or taxes are impacted by items judged by Management to be outside of ordinary banking activities and/or by items that, while they may be associated with ordinary banking activities, are so unusually large that their outsized impact is believed by Management at that time to be infrequent or short term in nature. We refer to such items as "Significant Items". Most often, these Significant Items result from factors originating outside the company – e.g., regulatory actions/assessments, windfall gains, changes in accounting principles, one-time tax assessments/refunds, litigation actions, etc. In other cases they may result from Management decisions associated with significant corporate actions out of the ordinary course of business – e.g., merger/restructuring charges, recapitalization actions, goodwill impairment, etc. Even though certain revenue and expense items are naturally subject to more volatility than others due to changes in market and economic environment conditions, as a general rule volatility alone does not define a Significant Item. For example, changes in the provision for credit losses, gains/losses from investment activities, asset valuation write-downs, etc., reflect ordinary banking activities and are, therefore, typically excluded from consideration as a Significant Item. Management believes the disclosure of “Significant Items”, when appropriate, aids analysts/investors in better understanding corporate performance and trends so that they can ascertain which of such items, if any, they may wish to include/exclude from their analysis of the company’s performance - i.e., within the context of determining how that performance differed from their expectations, as well as how, if at all, to adjust their estimates of future performance accordingly. To this end, Management has adopted a practice of listing “Significant Items” in its external disclosure documents (e.g., earnings press releases, quarterly performance discussions, investor presentations, Forms 10-Q and 10-K).
"Significant Items" for any particular period are not intended to be a complete list of items that may materially impact current or future period performance. A number of items could materially impact these periods, including those described in Huntington’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other factors described from time to time in Huntington’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.Annualized data Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are presented on an “annualized” basis. This is done for analytical and decision-making purposes to better discern underlying performance trends when compared to full year or year-over-year amounts. For example, loan and deposit growth rates, as well as net charge-off percentages, are most often expressed in terms of an annual rate like 8%. As such, a 2% growth rate for a quarter would represent an annualized 8% growth rate. Fully-taxable equivalent interest income and net interest margin Income from tax-exempt earning assets is increased by an amount equivalent to the taxes that would have been paid if this income had been taxable at statutory rates. This adjustment puts all earning assets, most notably tax-exempt municipal securities and certain lease assets, on a common basis that facilitates comparison of results to results of competitors. Earnings per share equivalent data Significant income or expense items may be expressed on a per common share basis. This is done for analytical and decision-making purposes to better discern underlying trends in total corporate earnings per share performance excluding the impact of such items. Investors may also find this information helpful in their evaluation of the company’s financial performance against published earnings per share mean estimate amounts, which typically exclude the impact of Significant Items. Earnings per share equivalents are usually calculated by applying a 35% effective tax rate to a pre-tax amount to derive an after-tax amount, which is divided by the average shares outstanding during the respective reporting period. Occasionally, when the item involves special tax treatment, the after-tax amount is disclosed separately, with this then being the amount used to calculate the earnings per share equivalent.
RoundingPlease note that columns of data in this document may not add due to rounding. Basel III Estimates Basel III Tier I common capital ratio estimates are based on management’s current interpretation, expectations, and understanding of the final U.S. Basel III rules adopted by the Federal Reserve Board and released on July 2, 2013. About Huntington Huntington Bancshares Incorporated is a $56 billion regional bank holding company headquartered in Columbus, Ohio. The Huntington National Bank, founded in 1866, provides full-service commercial, small business, and consumer banking services; mortgage banking services; treasury management and foreign exchange services; equipment leasing; wealth and investment management services; trust services; brokerage services; customized insurance brokerage and service programs; and other financial products and services. The principal markets for these services are Huntington’s six-state retail banking franchise: Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, and Kentucky. The primary distribution channels include a banking network of more than 725 traditional branches and convenience branches located in grocery stores and retirement centers, and through an array of alternative distribution channels including internet and mobile banking, telephone banking, and more than 1,400 ATMs. Through automotive dealership relationships within its six-state retail banking franchise area and selected other Midwest and New England states, Huntington also provides commercial banking services to the automotive dealers and retail automobile financing for dealer customers.