SEC's Lifting of Ban Is Move in Right Direction

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- An 80-year advertising restriction on hedge funds was partially removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday by a 4-1 vote.

Hedge funds, private markets and fraudsters now have fewer restrictions marketing to the investing public. It's the fraudsters component that is the cause of worry. The marketing ban was put in place to prevent evil-doers from soliciting the unsuspecting and "unsophisticated" (SEC's words, not mine). I will describe that in a moment, but let's first look at what it means:
  • Hedge funds and others raising investment capital can advertise their offerings to the general public. Specifically, the rule affects offerings that are private and are not required to report financial statements publicly.
  • The ruling does not change who may purchase these securities. Only "accredited investors" may purchase. Anyone can see the marketing, but issuers and hedge funds are required to make reasonable efforts to ensure only accredited investors are afforded the opportunity to participate.

According to the SEC, an accredited investor is a single person who earned at least $200,000 a year in the past two years and reasonably expects his or her income to continue.

For married couples, the minimum amount of income is $300,000 per year. Another way into the club is if you have at least $1 million in assets above and beyond your primary residence. If you don't meet the requirements, you now can look at the menu, but you can't order from it.

The dust hasn't settled yet, and other modifications and or further regulations may be adopted. For example, a proposal requiring issuers to notify the SEC 15 days before initiating and again at the completion of marketing passed by a 3-2 vote and is now available for public comment before final action is taken.

I hope the SEC doesn't tie up the relaxation with so many new rules that the final result is a de facto ban and nothing changes. It was a long overdue directional change that took an act of Congress to push the SEC into action.

Unfortunately, we can't give the SEC credit for finally discovering the U.S. Constitution and its First Amendment, including the "small part" about freedom of speech. After the passage of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, the SEC was forced into action. The highly politicized SEC didn't act swiftly and decisively, but the action is positive news and a step in the right direction.

In fairness, the motivation to drag their feet is born from noble intentions. The lone nay vote came from Commissioner Luis Aguilar over his concern that the bar to commit fraud is lowered. Aguilar argues lowering restrictions will "...come at the expense of investors and place investors at greater risk."

If you liked this article you might like

3 High-Dividend Stocks That Can Handily Beat the Market

7 Vital Retirement and Estate Rules Baby Boomers Need to Follow Now

Why Only Some Airline Tickets Are Falling With Lower Oil Prices

Three Stocks to Buy in 2015: Las Vegas Sands, Seagate and Wynn Resorts

Top Ten Critical Rules Every First-Time Homebuyer Needs To Follow