- that LPI did not breach any contractual duties to Plaintiffs,
- that LPI disclosed that the life expectancy and rate of return were estimates only,
- that LPI adequately informed Plaintiffs of the risks involved in the investment,
- that LPI breached no contractual duties to Plaintiffs related to the life expectancies or rates of return, and
- there is no fiduciary or special relationship between LPI and Plaintiffs.
- there was no genuine issue of material fact that the Texas state court entered a prior final judgment on the merits in the action between Plaintiffs and LPI,
- the Federal case is based on the same claims that were or could have been raised in the Texas state court action; and
- The Plaintiffs’ claims in the Federal case are barred under claim preclusion.
The case is styled Angela Austin al. v. Life Partners, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:11-CV-01767-PMP-GWF, United States District Court for the District of Nevada.Life Partners is the world's oldest and one of the most active companies in the United States engaged in the secondary market for life insurance, commonly called "life settlements." Since its incorporation in 1991, Life Partners has completed almost 150,000 transactions for its worldwide client base of over 29,000 high net worth individuals and institutions in connection with the purchase of over 6,500 policies totaling over $3.1 billion in face value. LPHI-G