"Plans have been laid for the next five years and a vision set for the next 10. Now is the right time to bring in a CEO who will drive the next phase of Lululemon's development and growth. I will continue to actively lead the organization while the board searches for a new CEO, and will work to ensure a smooth transition."
exception of one company executive, everyone was taken by complete surprise. But this is not the end of the world. Day was not fired. She was not caught up in a horrendous scandal that all but forced her resignation. No, she resigned on her own, for personal reasons. Management likely expected shareholders to be upset, but probably thought that the nice earnings beat would soften the blow. As if a top and bottom line beat wasn't enough, the company also provided excellent second quarter guidance. While analysts were expecting earnings of 33 cents per share on $328 million in revenue, Lululemon guided way above expectations, looking for earnings of 33 cents per share to 35 cents per share on revenue of $340 million to $345 million. Earnings per share estimates are fairly close to what analysts expected, but revenue was much higher than most had anticipated. Assume for a moment that Lululemon hits the middle of the provided range ($342.5 million) and that analysts don't adjust their revenue figures. Then we're talking about a $14.5 million dollar beat on top line results. It would appear that the company (which typically beats its own estimates quite handily) thinks they are fine -- with or without Christine Day. In fact, Day believes this too, stating on the conference call:
This is not an operational issue, it is a personnel issue. She is willing to step away and know that the company will remain strong. Lululemon now needs a leader to step into Day's role and execute the plan in front of them. The growth, international expansion and sales are all still intact. The company even raised its full year estimates, albeit slightly. I get that Day was important to shareholders and that this announcement had some form of shock factor to it but investors should ask themselves one important question: Is Christine Day worth 20% of the share price? If the answer is "no," they should be buying. Day didn't even need to say what she did for us to know that the company is fine. The pants problem is in the past, the company beat earnings, raised estimates and this apparel giant is going to continue into its next phase of growth. Although Lululemon's level of revenue growth is much closer -- and is actually higher -- than that of Under Armour ( UA), its valuation isn't. At least, in the short-term that is. Lululemon now has a price-to-earnings ratio of 36, whereas Under Armour's is more than 50. This is a classic overreaction and soon investors will see that Lululemon is a steal, especially when compared to its rivals. At least the Canadian-based company can have a laugh or two about it. This morning when I went to its Web site, a giant red banner on the homepage read, "CEO Wanted. Click Here To Apply." Follow @traderboy23 This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.