That said, I still don't quite understand why. Scratch that. I understand why. I just don't think it makes sense in the grand scheme of things. On the bright side, it's -- most likely -- fantastic news for consumers. If Apple has a weakness, it's software. While iOS and OS X are both best of breed, it's the affiliated software and service platforms that leave a bit to be desired. Some are way more mediocre than they should be (e.g., iTunes). Others, such as Ping, flat out failed despite considerable fanfare from Apple ahead of launch. But I hold out hope Apple will hit a home run with iRadio (though I hope they fool us and call it something else). Even if it's not great, I don't expect it to go the way of Ping. iRadio will make the Internet radio space richer, providing consumers with even more choice in an already eclectic space. Ironically, it might help Pandora's bottom line. And, although it could sting Pandora a little, Apple's entry could help shake out some of the chaos in the music royalty war that's currently raging.
It's also a win for the music industry. Forget about royalties -- though Apple will pay more per song than Pandora -- and focus on promotion. Pandora already drives music sales on iTunes. Reportedly, that will be a phenomenon Apple hopes to extend with iRadio. The music industry needs this as services such as Rdio deemphasize music purchases, even if unintentionally. Assuming Apple immediately becomes the No. 1 or No. 2 Internet radio player, the labels will welcome having the top two services focused on personalization and discovery, on the basis of listener tastes, which leads to more record sales on iTunes.
A worthy read in Mashable suggests Apple is getting into music streaming simply because everybody else is already there. While streaming will only "increase sales 'marginally,' if at all," it could help keep existing owners of Apple hardware locked into its ecosystem. That hypothesis, which makes considerable sense to me, stinks of a company that has lost focus. To keep customers stuck in its ecosystem, Apple needs to continue to produce excellent hardware. So, when it's upgrade time at your wireless carrier, you don't jump ship to Windows Phone or Android. Apple still sells units and grows market share not because of its software, but because of its hardware. That's where Tim Cook should focus, not on a side business that will remain a side business even if it doubles or triples in size. This is not to say that success in streaming or mobile advertising of this magnitude would not be impressive. Even for a world beater like Apple, it would be. It's just to say that Apple has a history of saying "no" more than it says "yes," even to good ideas. Steve Jobs always told us it was sometimes difficult to say no, but Apple was better off for it. I agree. Which is one reason why consumers and the music industry will enjoy more upside from iRadio than AAPL investors. This is absolutely not the next big thing. Follow @rocco_thestreet -- Written by Rocco Pendola in Santa Monica, Calif.