Beating the Market via Dividends and Buybacks

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- I'm always on the lookout for value-related search criteria that exhibit potential for good performance, and last August I extolled the potential virtues of companies that are simultaneously buying back stock and paying dividends.

I've long been a fan of companies that increase their dividends, primarily because dividends don't lie and can't be manipulated the way earnings can.

Rising dividends also indicate some level of confidence by management, at least in my view.

In terms of buybacks, I am not interested in companies that announce repurchase programs and don't follow through on them.

But adding the buyback criteria where companies have actually repurchased stock, seemed an interesting way to strengthen the search.

Nine months since that original column ran, I am encouraged by the early results. (I preface that with the word "early" as nine months is but a day to us value investor types.)

By way of reminder, the screen I used included the following criteria:
  • Minimum Market Cap: $2.5 billion.
  • Increasing dividends for each of the past seven years.
  • Minimum dividend yield of 2%.
  • Decrease in shares outstanding of at least 5% in the past year.

Just 19 names made the cut with this fairly stringent search, but the results since last August have me convinced that this is a concept worth pursuing further. Just one name, Intel ( INTC) was in negative territory, down 4.2%. The average return for the 19 qualifiers was a fairly compelling 25.4%, easily beating the S&P 500 (up 16.6%) and the Russell 2000 (up 21%).

The biggest gainers included Lowe's ( LOW) (up 65.2%), Ameriprise Financial ( AMP) (up 54%), Safeway ( SWY) (up 51.4%), Assurant ( AIZ) (up 46.6%) and Walgreen ( WAG) (up 41.8%).

Interestingly, there were no home runs and no terrible performers. There was just a boatload of singles and doubles, and that's all you really need.

LOW Chart LOW data by YCharts

Granted, this group of companies performed better than the markets in very positive market conditions, but I would be very curious to see how they'd perform in more negative conditions.

Given the dividend yield of the group, which was just a bit more than 3% when I wrote the original column, I'd expect better than market performance on the downside too, but I haven't been able to put this theory to the test -- not that I'm hoping for that opportunity. However, sooner or later it will happen, and we'll obtain the evidence as to whether this is a decent strategy in up and down markets.

If you liked this article you might like

Buying Nvidia Now Is Like Getting Intel Way Back in 1993, Jim Cramer Says

Google's Waymo Teams With Intel on Self Driving Technology

Amazon, Google and Other U.S. Tech Giants Face a Battle Over Taxes With Europe

S&P 500 and Dow on Track for Records With Markets in Good Mood Ahead of Fed

Cramer: Nvidia Is More Than Just a Pet Name