Investors Lose In Crowdfunding

NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- The crowd that crowdfunding helps is not the investor crowd, but the company crowd. The crowdfunding concept has always been first and foremost about business assistance -- not helping out newbie venture capitalists. It was born after all out of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act -- not the Let's Look Out For Small Investors Act.

The rules and regulations have yet to be determined by the Securities and Exchange Commission; however, some movement has been detected for crowdfunding guidelines with accredited investors.

The issuance of two no-action letters by the SEC for AngelList and The FundersClub gives the market an idea of where the SEC's thinking is and how the companies plan to make money. Basically, the two companies submitted their business plans, and the SEC came back and approved those plans, essentially saying it would take "no action" if they proceeded with those plans.

AngelList says it already has 12,000 accredited investors and with a partnership with SecondMarket could reach 20,000. AngelList also punts to Second Market for investor and company vetting. The SEC and FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) are ultimately responsible for the protection of investors.

Chance Barnett, CEO of Crowdfunder, believes that many of these websites like AngelList will eventually become broker-dealers themselves and reduce their dependence on companies like Second Market for their financial backbones.

FundersClub is a wholly owned subsidiary of a larger venture capital firm and does its own due diligence on the companies and investor status. The more interesting aspect of the no-action letter is how these companies plan to make any money out of this.

The SEC wrote, "Although the money invested by the investors may include administrative fees, you represent that FundersClub and FC Management currently do not receive any compensation."

The company will earn money on management fees for an investment fund or carried interest, which is the profit of the investment fund but is limited to 30%.

It seems that the only investor protection discussed in these letters is that investors' money will pass through to an escrow account and that the site can't withdraw deposited funds. Investors will have to trust these companies that have little mechanisms to make money will not be tempted to touch theirs.

So, if little attention is being paid to investor protection in crowdfunding, what does the investor get for taking this risk?: the pure joy of investing in a business -- stock that can't be sold anywhere and essentially has no value. Also, there's ownership in a company without the owner perks.

The only way a shareholder can potentially place a value on the shares is if the company gets acquired or the primary owner buys them out.

The definition of investing is "participating in a business enterprise that offers the possibility of profit." That notion is turned upside down when it comes to crowdfunding. There is no talk of future return in crowdfunding -- merely the pleasure of helping your fellow capitalist.

"I love Title III," says Doug Ellenoff, a leading crowdfunding attorney. (Title III is the part of the JOBS Act for accredited investors.) "It's a mechanism to help entrepreneurs get access to capital," he says.

Ellenoff expects that many of the deals will be with community businesses, like maybe a restaurateur who owns several local locations. He believes community members will want to invest in a business they know.

"You have an interest in that business; maybe you get a discount there," he suggested. Ellison points out that large broker-dealers have no interest in getting involved in the offerings because the deals are too small.

However, isn't that what community banks are for? Of course, the catch is that when a bank lends money, it expects to get paid back with interest. Crowdfunding investors get nothing back. Companies have no obligations to their investors. None.

Ellenoff noted that investors will be protected through education, and that it won't be an easy click-through type of online button. You know the type -- multiple paragraphs followed by an "I Agree" button. He envisions an interactive education experience, whereby investors have to read paragraphs and answer specific questions. He believes that when investors are educated, they will be protected.

Ellenoff also notes that there will be limits on the amount that can be purchased during a 12-month period. Limits between $2,000 and $100,000 have been established. However, limiting losses doesn't necessarily protect shareholders.

If you liked this article you might like

Liberty Media Wins the Keys to Formula One Racing

Liberty Media Reportedly Closing in on Formula One

Here's the Best Way for Investors to Play the IPO Market

12.3% Of FPX Holdings Seeing Recent Insider Buys

2014 IPOs Already Beating Last Year's Numbers