NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- As a student of Skepticism, I really enjoy uncovering the logical fallacies tech writers create when pitting one company against another.I enjoy it because it's fun watching them get caught up in their own exuberance trying to make a point and miss the opportunity due to lazy journalism. This seems seems to happen more when it involves someone trying to knock down Apple ( AAPL). I was alerted to just such a piece by an apparent detractor of mine, who is also a follower of my AppleInvestor Twitter feed. He's obviously a Samsung fan, evidenced by the Samsung Twitter references he stuffed in the tweet. I guess he thought by sending me the tweet he was offering incontrovertible evidence that Samsung had gained an advantage over a hapless Apple. Somewhere in his mind, he probably thought this spelled impending doom for the iMaker.
Samsung took advantage of Apple's oversight. Samsung maintained its SG&A budget at 15% of revenues -- even growing it to 24% for a brief time in 2009, before returning to 15%....Instead of looking back at its old ad budget in dollars...Samsung allowed the budget to grow...along with revenues...And that's how Samsung changed the game on Apple. Once America's untouchable brand...People now question Apple's sustainability.Nowhere in the article does Hartung explain how this information is relevant, or how it makes this a "game changer" for Samsung, although earlier in the article he does wax fantastic how great Apple once was. I was really hoping to read a reasoned argument. Instead, I was left confused. -- Written by Ernie Varitimos, author of the Apple Investor blog. This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.