NEW YORK (ETF Expert) -- I genuinely expected the primary media outlets to spin the 7.6% unemployment rate as cause for celebration. Instead, many finally chose to explain the reality behind employment in America; that is, the number of potential employees in the labor force is at 63.3% -- the lowest percentage of workers in the workforce since 1979.Psychologically, it may feel better to hear that the unemployment rate is at its lowest level in four years. However, when 500,000 Americans stop working, cease looking for employment and are no longer accounted for in the official data, the creation of a mere 88,000 jobs will distort the true picture. In fact, I cannot recall a greater disconnect between one unemployment stat that trumpets sterling success (i.e., U-2 at 7.6%) and another that reflects dismal deterioration (i.e., labor force participation at 63.3%). Is the country really getting its collective act together? Has the jobs outlook brightened such that things are dramatically better than four years earlier ... and trending in a positive direction? Or Is the employment picture the worst that it has been in nearly 34 years ... and trending in a negative direction? For weeks, I've been harping on the idea that investors should be raising cash and/or rotating to more defensive equities in non-cyclical segments. Examples include: 1. April 1, 2013. Selecting Safer Growth and Income ETFs for the Second-Quarter Pullback 2. March 13, 2013. Diminishing 'Wealth Effect' Requires ETF Portfolio Changes 3. February 22, 2013. Why An Upcoming Pullback Could Whack Financial ETFs By no means do I pretend to be prescient. Nor did I rely on the overhyped seasonal pattern of "Selling in May and Going Away." Rather, defensive sectors (e.g., consumer staples, health care, utilities, telecom, etc.) have been offering less beta risk than growth-oriented segments while simultaneously providing equal or greater reward. Are the defensive non-cyclicals expensive on a historical P/E basis? Absolutely. Yet the premium one is paying for that safety pays off during a time when worldwide economic uncertainty is massive. Can the U.S. stock market continue dismissing the deepening eurozone recession as well as the questionable solvency of many European financial institutions? Vanguard Europe ( VGK) does not seem to think so.
There are those who have angrily dismissed my suggestion to pare back on emergers, foreign developed ETFs and high beta segments. They labeled it "selling low." The truth is, I am simply controlling the outcome by selling assets for a big gain, small gain or a small loss. What some view as "selling low," I view as avoiding the unnecessary risks associated with watching certain assets travel a great deal lower. Similarly, I have advocated raising cash and rotating into safer opportunities. Those who have been reading me for years or listened to me as a national talk radio host in the late 90s know better. Cash is not "trash" when you are patiently putting money to work in areas that pull back to levels that you are comfortable entering. You can also employ stop-limit loss orders on new purchases. Equally important, when you sell a high-risk asset, you do not need to rotate immediately into a lower risk asset. You can wait in cash for corrective activity to give you the entry point that you desire. For example, if you have sold your exposure in PowerShares NASDAQ QQQ Trust ( QQQ), you do not need to immediately rotate into one of the many "faves" I have discussed. Unless you already have an ample cash buffer, it makes sense to wait for the desired asset to come to your price point, whether it is WisdomTree Equity Income ( DHS), iShares U.S. Minimum Volatility ( USMV) or GlobalX Super Dividend ( SDIV). The latter (SDIV) is near a 50-day support and could provide a reasonable entry point for those with cash on hand.
You can listen to the ETF Expert Radio Show "LIVE", via podcast or on your iPod. Follow @etfexpert This article was written by an independent contributor, separate from TheStreet's regular news coverage.