BELLEVUE, Wash., April 3, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The controversial Arms Trade Treaty passed by the United Nations General Assembly (GA) with the United States' support represents an alarming policy shift, and a potential threat to American gun rights, the Second Amendment Foundation said. "The vote was not about public safety," stated SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. " The United States already has the strongest regulations in the world on the international trade of conventional weapons." The U.S. broke with its policy requiring consensus and not only voted for the treaty but sponsored it. Julianne Versnel, SAF's Director of Operations, who spoke about self-defense in an NGO statement, expressed disappointment. "We have been working for 7 years on an ATT. There have been eight lengthy multi-day meetings and we still can't get the right of civilians to self-defense acknowledged," she observed. On March 27, after the final text of the ATT was released, SAF sent a letter to Assistant Secretary Thomas M. Countryman expressing concern and asking for clarification regarding several provisions of the proposed treaty. Also signing the letter were the National Rifle Association, Manufacturers Advisory Group, World Forum on Shooting Activities, Defense Small Arms Advisory Council, Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers Institute and Firearms Import/Export Roundtable. This laid out five main reservations. Of primary concern is the fact that civilian arms appeared to be included in the treaty, yet there is no recognition of the lawful right of civilians to own, trade and use small arms for self-defense. The language used in the Scope does not exclude "firearms that are lawfully owned by civilians and are not part of international commerce." The language was also unclear concerning international travel with firearms by hunters and sport shooters.