This column originally appeared on Real Money Pro at 8:38 a.m. EST on Jan. 28.NEW YORK ( Real Money) --
We're beginning to hear noises that we've reached a major turning point in the housing market -- and that, with interest rates so low, this is a rare opportunity to buy. But are such observations on target?It would be comforting if they were. Yet the unfortunate truth is that the tea leaves don't clearly suggest any particular path for prices, either up or down....The bottom line for potential home buyers or sellers is probably this: Don't do anything dramatic or difficult. There is too much uncertainty to justify any aggressive speculative moves right now. If you have personal reasons for getting into or out of the housing market, go ahead. Otherwise, don't stay up worrying about home prices any more than you do about stock prices.I can't offer any clearer picture, and I don't see a solid basis for anyone else to do so, either. -- Dr. Robert Shiller, " A New Housing Boom? Don't Count on It," The New York Times (Jan. 26, 2013)
- A real estate recovery is under way (led by multi-family starts), but a full-blown housing recovery is probably a few years away.
- A 2013-2014 recovery in the housing market (and for the consumer in general) will be impeded by the fiscal drag of higher individual tax rates and lower government spending and possibly by higher interest rates.
- Construction activity represents a relatively small fraction of GDP -- its aggregate impact on domestic economic growth is being overstated by many.
Multifamily housing is seeing the biggest growth; the housing start numbers from last week were misleading. Skewed data in the housing recovery is hiding the true problem -- too many multifamily homes, single homes won't see much of a bump unless first-time homebuyers get higher income. The point is that a drop in mortgage rates produced meager results, and we can't expect more stimulus money from the Fed to keep the number positive. Too much inventory of multifamily households is going to have an interesting effect on rents -- lots of competition will force rent prices to stay low; investors won't see a lot of return....In other words, what this still appears to be is a stimulus-induced bounce that can only be replicated in 2013 if (1) rates drop 0.75% to 1.00% below the average 2012 rate (i.e., 2.25% to 2.50% on a 30-year mortgage); (2) rates stay the same, and foreclosures and short sales surge (comes at the expense of prices); (3) exotic loan programs not requiring income or asset verification quickly become the norm; and (4) employment and income levels surge. -- Mark HansonAs Mark Hanson points out, the single-family housing market lacks durable leadership -- repeat buyers are carrying the housing market. The more important first-time homebuyers "are out of fire power" and peaked in May 2012, investor buyers peaked in June 2012, and all-cash existing sales volume turned flat in December 2012. I worry that the Fed's (non-duplicable) stimulus (ZIRP), which induced a housing recovery over the past 18 months, might have even pushed forward home activity and demand and could conceivably produce a 2013 hangover -- much like Cash for Clunkers , the Homebuyer Tax Credit (which led to outsized market strength in second half of 2009/first half of 2010) or any of the other one-time fiscal policy moves designed to take the economy out of the Great Decession of 2007-2009. Even if housing continues to recover and exhibits something more than a stimulus-related bounce, it would take a hell of a rise in construction activity to impact aggregate U.S. economic growth given construction's relatively small role in GDP. For illustration purposes, let's presume the consensus is correct and that the residential housing market will continue to exhibit strong growth. Construction represents only about 3% of GDP. Therefore a 20% increase in construction activity will only positively impact GDP by 0.6% (before the multiplier effect takes hold). This compares against a likely 1%-2% headwind from spending cuts and higher taxes (I am user a larger multiplier than most.) Bottom line: The future outlook (in both home sales activity and for home prices) is principally a function of three variables (and I hold to a less-than-optimistic view of all these factors). 1. Economic conditions: Strength in the domestic economy, wage growth and the status of the jobs market are the historic pillars of the housing market. I am less sanguine than most regarding these variables.
Economic ConditionsMy baseline expectation is for (at best) 1.5% real GDP growth in 2013 -- this is below consensus expectations. And I believe there is further risk to the downside. I remain particularly cautious on the consumer (and homebuyer), who, despite a slightly improving jobs market, faces numerous headwinds.
Credit ConditionsIn the last week the yield on the 10-year U.S. note rose from 1.82% to 1.95%. The consensus appears to be that the 10-year will rise no higher in yield than 2.25%-2.50% in 2013-- based in part on continued deleveraging, slow growth and a friendly Fed (which will effectively repress long rates). Homebuyers have become accustomed to low mortgage rates, but I would caution that given housing's historic rate sensitivity, any rise in interest rates above consensus expectations could immediately provide a headwind to the U.S. housing market. Indeed, I expect refinancing and purchase applications to suffer in the near term if rates continue last week's rise.
The Propensity to Own a HomeIt is different this time -- the average middle-class U.S. consumer is beaten up. Faced with two large stock market drawdowns in the last decade, a flash crash, screwflation (in which income has not kept pace with the costs of necessities of life: insurance, education, food, etc.), the largest economic recession since the Great Depression, continued jobs insecurity and a 30% drop in home prices, consumer behavior has changed and is not likely to revert to the historical spending patterns exhibited in the last few cycles.
Source: Mark Hanson